[EDITORIALS]Too Many Chiefs, No Indians
Published: 05 Jan. 2003, 19:38
We agree in principle with the government's plan to reduce the size of the civil service with the aim of ensuring equity with the restructuring programs going on in the private sector. But however well-intentioned the government may be, major side effects are inevitable with the less-than-adequate public sector restructuring program and the mess in the program's implementation. We have already experienced severe side effects from corporate and financial sector reform. Corporations have lost the will to invest, and the capital market is stagnant.
The U.S. government recently completed a reorganization program, which could have been used as a model here. Because of the lack of such program, however, the normal intake of 6,000 to 7,000 entry-level civil servants has virtually disappeared and "aging" at local governments is a serious problem. When selecting the target of personnel reduction, the basic structure of the civil service should not be touched, and the size of reductions should keep in mind how many new entry-level civil servants are needed.
While the government prioritized "hardware reform" over "software reform," we believe both should have been undertaken simultaneously. The quality of service would not have deteriorated this much even with the significant reduction in the number of Grade 9 officers if the government had passed on certain responsibilities to the private sector, streamlined overlapping roles and rearranged its personnel.
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.
Standards Board Policy (0/250자)