[EDITORIALS]How to replace U.S. troops?
Published: 18 May. 2004, 01:44
Moreover, the withdrawal of U.S. troops for Iraq could have a negative impact on our businesses at home and abroad, and could lead to a worsening of our already serious economic situation. The plunge in stock prices is not irrelevant to this.
The government must come up with specific plans to fill the security vacuum and assure the public of its capabilities to cope. That will mitigate uncertainty and insecurity.
The United States has said this was an inevitable measure, resulting from the worsening of the Iraqi situation. However, Washington’s advanced implementation of its strategy of “reduction of U.S forces in Korea” can also be seen as a result of accumulated discord between the two nations, which has became more apparent under the current administration. It is worth noting the positions of the two nations following this move. Both countries said that there were no prior consultations on this issue.
If this is true, it is deeply regrettable. The Roh administration ought to know very well the reason our alliance has become so frigid. It’s our loss. The issue is whether we have an alternative after we tell them, “Go if you want to go.” The reduction of U.S. forces must be at the speed and the number of troops that is bearable to us considering the situation with the North and the financial burden on us. Even if withdrawal takes place, we must maintain closer relations with the United States.
The government must show specific alternatives, rather than using rhetoric like “independent national defense in the next ten years,” or “cooperative independent defense.”
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.
Standards Board Policy (0/250자)