[Overseas view]No new Cold War looming

Home > Opinion > Columns

print dictionary print

[Overseas view]No new Cold War looming

Russia’s newly assertive foreign policy has reached the top of the world. On Aug. 2, a submarine crew planted a titanium Russian flag in the yellowish seabed more than two miles beneath the North Pole, laying Moscow’s claim to nearly half the Arctic Ocean floor ― and its potentially vast oil and gas reserves.
“This isn’t the 15th century. You can’t go around the world and just plant flags and say we’re claiming this territory,” said the foreign minister of Canada, a country with its own claim on Arctic territory.
“I don’t give a damn what all those foreign politicians are saying,” responded Artur Chilingarov, the Russian leader of the expedition, before spraying cheering crowds in Moscow with champagne.
President Vladimir Putin expressed his pride a bit more diplomatically, but this undersea land grab could generate considerable international friction over the next several years.
This is merely the most colorful recent example of Russia’s brash new foreign policy. Gazprom, Russia’s state-owned gas monopoly, has threatened one former Soviet republic, Belarus, with a cutoff of nearly half its natural gas supplies if the country doesn’t make back payments. Ukraine faced a similar temporary shutdown in January 2006.
Estonia has accused Russia of launching a cyber-attack on government, banking and media Web sites in the country following the Estonian government’s decision to remove a politically sensitive Soviet-era war memorial from the center of its capital city.
Yet another neighbor, Georgia, accused Russia on Aug. 7 of firing a missile at a village inside its territory. The missile didn’t explode, and the Kremlin denies it came from a Russian plane. But the deep-seated animosity between the two governments is well-established.
Russia is at loggerheads with Western governments over a number of issues. A dispute over Moscow’s refusal to extradite a former Russian security official to London for questioning in a politically incendiary murder investigation ― the poisoning of former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko ― has generated tit-for-tat diplomatic expulsions.
The list of issues that have soured Russia’s relations with the United States is long, [among them] NATO expansion into former Soviet territory, Kremlin opposition to the United States’ invasion of Iraq, Moscow’s conviction that Washington helped sparkpro-Western political upheavals in Georgia and Ukraine, Putin’s recent decision to withdraw Russia from the Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty and Russia’s vow to veto any United Nations resolution that recognizes Kosovo’s independence.
Does the newly confident Russia now threaten Western interests on a Soviet scale? Russia is in no position to pursue a global strategy of Soviet-style confrontation with the West.
First, Moscow hopes to continue to profit from openness to foreign investment as its middle class becomes an increasingly attractive market for foreign goods and services. Russia cannot afford the sort of international outlaw status that much of the international community now bestows on Iran or Venezuela.
Second, Russia is challenging the international balance of power on issues involving its perceived national interests, but lacks the political and economic heft to exert strong influence in Latin America, Africa or southern Asia. Russia’s economy is now just a little larger than Mexico’s ― and a little more than one-third the size of China’s.
Third, unlike the Soviet Union, today’s Russia provides no ideological appeal that might attract others to follow its lead.
Finally, unlike China, Russia already has the natural resources it needs. This limits the growth of common interests between Russia and other governments that is central to China’s 21st century foreign policy.
In fact, China remains a key variable in the Kremlin’s foreign-policy calculus. Moscow will only remain a powerful player in its neighborhood unless Russia and China one day find common interest in pooling their political and economic resources to challenge the West-led international order. That is highly unlikely to happen.
The two states will continue to find a tactical advantage in working together on specific foreign-policy issues ― as when they leveraged their influence within the Shanghai Cooperation Organization to encourage Uzbekistan to oust U.S. troops from bases on its territory in 2005.
But at the strategic level, Russian and Chinese interests are not always compatible.
Fear of China’s growing economic and military power remains strong within Russia’s political and security elite.
Moscow’s relations with Western governments have reached their lowest point since the end of the Cold War. That matters for the international conflict over Iran’s nuclear program, Russia’s relations with its neighbors and collaboration on Russian energy projects.
But there is no new Cold War on the horizon. Russia can reach the North Pole, but it is far from strong enough to challenge the current West-led international order.

*The writer is president of Eurasia Group, a political-risk consultancy. He can be reached via e-mail at research@eurasiagroup.net.

by Ian Bremmer
Log in to Twitter or Facebook account to connect
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
help-image Social comment?
lock icon

To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.

Standards Board Policy (0/250자)