[Viewpoint] Europe and the Arab spring

Home > Opinion > Columns

print dictionary print

[Viewpoint] Europe and the Arab spring

In 1989, the wall separating the two halves of Europe suddenly collapsed. Within the space of a few months, a hitherto seemingly immutable order gave way to commotion and impatience. At first, the old countries of Europe were paralyzed with fear of the unknown and anxiety about immigration - and then they seized with both hands the opportunity that history had offered to them.

Europe implemented financial assistance and technical assistance programs, opened trade talks and promised an eastward enlargement of the European Union, which eventually led to the free movement of workers across the former Iron curtain. Two decades later, these efforts have proven to be a spectacular success.

The economic and political transition of ex-communist Eastern Europe has been swift and deep. Moreover, with the dramatic exception of Yugoslavia, it was carried out peacefully, which contributed to strong economic performance.

Could a similar (obviously not identical) story unfold for the southern rim of the Mediterranean? This is the key economic question posed by today’s Arab Spring.

The EU’s 500 million citizens have 170 million neighbors between Agadir (Morocco) in the west of North Africa and Port Said (Egypt) in the east. These millions sit on Europe’s doorstep, eyeing with longing its prosperity and democracy. In Tunisia and Egypt, they have demonstrated their resolve by overturning regimes which many in the West saw as guarantors of stability. They are now asking nothing more than to be able to invest their energies in bringing about their countries’ recovery.

But, unless they have reason to believe that improvement is coming, today’s transforming dynamism will become the dynamism of despair - with all the risks that this implies.

The first priority is jobs. The young people driving the Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions are massively underemployed. We do not know if the official data, which reports roughly 30 percent youth unemployment, is correct but it is clear that these economies were incapable of absorbing the demographic wave of the last decades. Recent growth rates - 5-6 percent annually in Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, and Morocco - look strong but they are less impressive in light of ten years of 2.5 percent annual growth in the working-age population. Much stronger growth is needed if job creation is to keep pace.

The obstacles to growth are not chiefly macroeconomic. It is true that Egypt is fragile, that public finances and current-account balances will slump and that inflation will take off if governments try to respond to protests by spending money that they do not have. These countries must invest more and educate better, which will inevitably be costly. And international assistance will certainly need to be mobilized. But these are not the most pressing issues.

The main brake on development lies in these countries’ economic institutions. According to the World Bank, a building permit in Egypt costs three times the average annual income, 11 different steps are needed to register a property transaction in Algeria and Morocco is ranked 154th out of 183 countries for protection of shareholders against abuse of power by management.

These handful of examples all point to economies where development is impeded by bureaucracy, monopoly rents - often the result of political patronage or nepotism - and sclerotic credit markets.

It is unworkable, and should thus be unthinkable, to try to export the solutions used in Eastern Europe, which were based on importing EU legislation with a view to enlargement. But the current political revolutions do present a once-in-a-lifetime chance for economic emancipation, which the EU can support by creating incentives for reform and mobilizing its development banks.

Given its dominant role in the region, Europe can exert a more direct impact on policies affecting trade and mobility. Today, migration is extremely circumscribed. Professional mobility must be allowed without delay. Free circulation of goods is also limited. As a proportion of GDP, Tunisia’s trade with the EU is half that of the Czech Republic, and Morocco’s is a quarter that of Poland.

Openness on Europe’s part is needed not only for goods, but also services. So Europe should promote much more than it has so far an outsourcing model in the most labor-intensive segments of the value chain, as Germany has done with great success (particularly in Eastern Europe), which partly explains its bounce-back to export dominance in global markets.

While this model may entail some initial job losses in Europe, it would also preserve jobs in the long run by keeping production sites competitive, and create jobs by paving the way for development - and thus export markets - in North Africa.

French Prime Minister Pierre Mendes-France, who in the 1950’s withdrew his country from war in Vietnam and colonization in Tunisia, famously said that governing is choosing. Europe’s choice now is clear: mobilize to help its neighbors open up their economies and societies, or start beefing up its coast guards and ordering patrol boats.

*The writer is the director of Bruegel, an international economics think tank, a professor of economics at Universite Paris-Dauphine and a member of the French Prime Minister’s Council of Economic Analysis.

By Jean Pisani-Ferry
Log in to Twitter or Facebook account to connect
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
help-image Social comment?
lock icon

To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.

Standards Board Policy (0/250자)