Korea’s debt to Park Chung Hee
The Chinese classic “I Ching” (“Book of Changes”) says the revolutions of King Tang and King Wu followed the will of heaven and responded to the call of the people. King Tang of Shang overthrew Jie, the last king of the Xia Dynasty who was infatuated with his beautiful but unworthy concubine Mo Xi. King Wu ended the tyranny of the Qin Dynasty’s King Zhou, who was known for filling ponds with alcohol, putting meat on trees and having naked men and women play in the courtyard. The “I Ching,” therefore, confirmed that the revolutions of King Tang and King Wu followed the design of the heavens. In Eastern civilizations, revolution has a positive connotation.
In contrast, a coup d’etat, which is not exactly the same as a revolution but is often used interchangeably, has a negative connotation. Coup d’etat, the overthrow of a system by a certain group, especially a small group, literally means “a stroke of state” in French.
The most notable figure who seized power through a successful coup was Napoleon Bonaparte. He believed that a revolution can only be realized through the use of firearms and swords, and French citizens suffered from his iron-fisted rule. Of course, not all coups are criticized - the Meiji Restoration laid the foundation for Japan’s modernization.
In Korea, yesterday was the 50th anniversary of the May 16 Revolution. There is still debate about whether it was really a revolution or a coup. But there is little disagreement that Park Chung Hee’s action signaled a crucial turning point in the country’s economic development. Park, who led the coup, has been criticized as a dictator, but a recent survey put him at the top of the list of “presidents you want to vote for again.” These results have inspired us to reflect again on the past, present and future of Korea.
*The writer is a senior international affairs reporter of the JoongAng Ilbo.
By Nam Jeong-ho