Museum unconvinced by new Van Gogh death theoryAMSTERDAM - Two American authors believe Vincent van Gogh was fatally shot by two teenagers and did not die from self-inflicted wounds, but the new theory won a skeptical reception Monday from experts at the museum dedicated to the 19th-century Dutch artist.
A book by Pulitzer Prize-winning authors Steven Naifeh and Gregory White Smith, “Van Gogh, The Life,” concludes that Van Gogh, who suffered chronic depression, claimed on his deathbed to have shot himself to protect the boys. “Covering up his own murder,” Naifeh said in an interview broadcast Sunday on CBS’s “60 Minutes.”
Leo Jansen, curator of the Van Gogh Museum and editor of the artist’s letters, said the biography is a “great book,” but experts have doubts about the authors’ theory of Van Gogh’s death in 1890.
“We cannot yet agree with their conclusions because we do not think there is enough evidence yet,” Jansen told the Associated Press.
At the same time, there has never been any independent evidence to support Van Gogh’s dying confession that he had shot himself.
“There’s no proof. We just know what he said, and that’s what people always went by,” Jansen said.
Severely wounded in the chest, Van Gogh dragged himself to the rooming house in Auvers-sur-Oise, France, where he was staying. He died about 30 hours later after telling his brother Theo, several doctors and the police that he had shot himself while painting in a wheat field. The gun was never found.
Naifeh and Smith revived unanswered questions that have clouded Van Gogh’s own story: How did the painter, who had a widely known history of mental illness, obtain a revolver, and what happened to it? Why would he shoot himself at such an odd angle and not put the muzzle next to his heart? How did he manage with his wound to make the difficult journey more than one mile through the fields back to town?
The authors say an art historian who visited Auvers in the 1930s heard rumors from citizens who were alive in 1890 that Van Gogh had been shot accidentally by two boys. They also discovered a “guilt-ridden” 1956 interview by a wealthy French businessman, Rene Secretan, who said he and his brother had known Van Gogh that summer and had tormented him mercilessly. Secretan, inspired by a Wild West show that was popular in France, borrowed a gun from the owner of the inn where Van Gogh was staying, but he claimed the artist stole it from him. The authors say Secretan was never asked if he had been involved in the shooting, and he died the following year.
Naifeh said the evidence indicates that the shooting “involved these two boys. And that it was either an accident or a deliberate act. Was it playing cowboy in some way that went awry? Was it teasing with the gun with Vincent lunging out? It’s hard to know what went on at that moment.”