[Viewpoint] Qatar and Al JazeeraThere’s a joke making the rounds in the Middle East these days: three of Egypt’s former presidents, Gamal Abdel Nasser, Anwar el-Sadat and Hosni Mubarak, meet in hell and ask each other how they fell. Nasser replies “poison”; Sadat says “assassination”; and Mubarak answers “Al Jazeera.”
During the 15 years that it has broadcast from Qatar, Al Jazeera has served as far more than a traditional television station. With its fearless involvement in Arab politics, it has created a new venue for political freedom, which has culminated in its unreserved support for Arab revolutions.
Al Jazeera has pushed the boundaries of information by providing live coverage of major developments in the Arab world and elsewhere. It is a platform for political and religious opposition groups in the Arab countries. It hosts Israeli spokespersons and embraces state-of-the-art broadcasting techniques. In short, it has become a global brand and a role model for other Arab media.
Success breeds confidence, but it also attracts envy. Al Jazeera has no shortage of enemies, from the most radical Islamic fundamentalists to American and Israeli intelligence gatherers. And, between these two extremes, there is fierce debate over whether Al Jazeera is a friend or a foe.
Liberals who welcome it as a beacon of freedom and progress in the Arab world confront those who accuse it of Islamism and religious radicalization. Islamists who praise it as a platform for their own views must deal with the fact that it also offers a voice to Israelis. Al Jazeera journalists are household names; they also suffer more harassment, imprisonment and fatalities than their colleagues at other major news organizations.
Al Jazeera is not a tool of the CIA, Israel or Al Qaeda. Rather, it is the sophisticated mouthpiece of the state of Qatar and its ambitious emir, Hamad al-Thani. Simply put, the Al Jazeera success story would not have been possible without Qatar’s backing. For al-Thani, Al Jazeera is integral to the national “branding” of Qatar and its foreign-policy aspirations.
The motivation for these aspirations is unclear, but several possibilities are worth pondering.
After deposing his father in a palace coup in 1995, al-Thani was suddenly confronted with a hostile Saudi Arabia and Egypt, whose elites despised the ambitious young ruler and preferred his more timid father.
Many suspected the Egyptians and Saudis of organizing the military coup that targeted al-Thani the following year.
In response, under the young Emir’s firm hand, Al Jazeera attacked the two governments for many years, nearly ending Qatar’s diplomatic relations with them.
Having received carte blanche from Qatar’s political leadership to support the Arab revolutions, Al Jazeera became fully engaged in live coverage of events in Tunisia, and then in Egypt, by relying on social-media networks away from the eyes of local security officials. Its coverage was filled with Arab masses declaring their demands to the world.
Banned from local media and mostly on the run, revolutionaries used Al Jazeera to reach - and mobilize - their own people. The channel canceled its regular programs and was transformed into a round-the-clock workshop of live news and interviews, switching from one revolution to another.
So, while the Arab Spring has been a genuine popular uprising against decades of corrupt and oppressive authoritarian regimes, its rapid spread, which caught almost everyone by surprise, was due in part to the influence of Al Jazeera, which became the voice of the voiceless throughout the Middle East. As for Qatar itself, al-Thani provided various forms of support to all of the Arab revolutions, except in Bahrain, where the Saudis and, more pointedly, the Americans, drew a very sharp red line.
Qatar has adopted an aggressive and risky foreign policy, but al-Thani clearly believes that he can fill a regional leadership vacuum. His support, via Al Jazeera, of the Arab Spring’s revolutions - and of the new generation of leaders that they have spawned - has only strengthened Qatar’s position.
The falling regimes consistently maintained that Al Jazeera wasn’t neutral. They were right.
*Copyright: Project Syndicate/Europe’s World, 2011.
The writer is director of the media program at the Gulf Research Center, University of Cambridge.
By Khaled Hroub