[Viewpoint] Wearing environment - eco fashion

Home > Opinion > Columns

print dictionary print

[Viewpoint] Wearing environment - eco fashion

In the past decade, the Korean fashion industry has risen to global ranks, displaying its designs from Paris to New York and Tokyo and joining international collections shown at local showcases like Busan’s 2011 Pret-a-Porter (Ready-to-Wear) and Seoul Fashion Week. The accolades are piling up, too. For example, world-renowned fashion blogger Scott Schuman called the collection by Korean designer Jeong Wook-joon “the best show of Paris collection” at the fall and winter 2012 fashion show for men’s wear in the French fashion capital.

The Korean industry, growing nearly 5 percent annually, is now seen as another swirling force in the Korean Wave. However, as it attracts increasing attention and rubs shoulders with global pace setters from Italy and France, Korean fashion companies are elevating themselves to a higher league in which standards apart from creativity and commercial viability are being applied.

Last year, the Seoul fashion show of Italian high fashion house Fendi was almost canceled after being bombarded by animal rights activists for its use of fur in its collection. But the global fashion industry is being held accountable for more than fur. From water polluted by dyes or wasted on growing cotton for “fast fashion” items that are discarded in just days, the industry is being closely scrutinized. In response, “green” has become the latest buzz word.

Spearheading eco-fashion is British designer Stella McCartney, daughter of Paul McCartney of the Beatles. She not only has her name on luxury brands but also has her own line with shoemaker Adidas. And unlike other luxury brands, her clothing does not include fur or animal leather and is well-known for being made from organic materials via environmentally friendly production processes. Furthermore, in order to minimize waste, the fabric is not cut but folded, which is said to be the secret to making the clothes look more sophisticated.

Now, Italian luxury brands are making concerted efforts to distance themselves from their once eco-unfriendly image. For example, Prada prints snake skin patterns on fabric bags or coats them instead of using real snake hide, Ferragamo manufactures with leather that is produced in an eco-friendly way and Gucci uses eco-friendly packaging.

Going one step further, sports brand Nike developed a method that considers the environment even from the beginning stages of product development. Called “Considered Design,” the process uses fewer toxic substances, saves energy and produces less waste. In Levi’s case, it uses recycled buttons and zippers, and a “waterless jeans” dyeing process.

What is noteworthy is that the entire launch product lines may be produced from recycled or biodegradable materials made from bamboo or soybeans. The maker of every woman’s dream shoes, Manolo Blahnik, for example, went as far as to design and launch shoes made from cork. Although many would think, “How can you make shoes out of wine cork?” In fact, cork is superior when it comes to water resistance, durability and is an anti-pollutant. It is also highly likely that it will be commonly used as a substitute for leather when making shoes in the near future. Similarly, researchers in all parts of the world are trying to develop materials made from natural resources, including seaweed, pineapple and banana leaves.

Enormous effort is also being put into developing technologies that will reduce the impact of dyeing which not only pollutes but entails using a lot of water (85 percent of total water usage to produce clothing). In order to save water, China’s Fongs Industries Company has developed a machine that uses air instead of water. Using this machine, the 6,762 liquid ounces of water needed to dye a single T-shirt can be reduced to a mere 1,690 liquid ounces. Similarly, Air Dye, a technology developed by Colorep in the U.S., employs heat instead of water to transfer the dye directly from paper to fabric. Both processes are significantly more eco-friendly, saving both water and energy and reducing toxic waste.

Going forward, in their new role as fashion trendsetters, Korean apparel companies can expect to come under pressure to replicate or modify those types of eco-friendly practices. Hence, they must begin to seriously contemplate shifting their entire value chain from marketing to producing materials to become more eco-friendly. This will have wide implications on all levels, from the fast fashion businesses in budget retail areas to the chic and glamorous fashion houses. Retooling the way they design and manufacture will require enormous effort but failure to heed the green movement risks blistering criticism by eco-activists, which could seriously damage the more than $25 billion business and industry image.

*The author is a research associate at Samsung Economic Research Institute.

by Ha Joo-hyun
Log in to Twitter or Facebook account to connect
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
help-image Social comment?
lock icon

To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.

Standards Board Policy (0/250자)