Is having a baby cost-prohibitive?

Home > National > Social Affairs

print dictionary print

Is having a baby cost-prohibitive?

테스트


Korea, which suffers from one of the lowest birth rates in the world, is an expensive place to have a baby, recent studies find.

The high cost of prenatal and postpartum care and difficulties in fertilization, paired with a decline in clinics and doctors, also contribute to the low birth rate in Korea.

The JoongAng Ilbo and the Planned Population Federation of Korea conducted an investigation into the reason behind the low birthrate here and found that it costs far more to give birth in Korea than in other neighboring countries such as Japan.

A 34-year-old woman surnamed Kim from Yongsan District, central Seoul, in her 25th week of pregnancy has spent 1.36 million won ($1,198) on her checkups.

테스트

Since she got pregnant in April, she has had seven checkups and received various examinations including ultrasounds and checking the soundness of the baby, whether it has any problems or deformities.

The ultrasound examination was the cheapest of the bunch at 33,000 won per examination but the amniocentesis, or amniotic fluid test, which tests any chromosomal abnormalities, costs 840,000 won.

She estimates that by the time she gives birth in December, she will have spent 6.71 million won on prenatal care, of which the government supports just 500,000 won.

This includes 14-15 examinations until birth. If she has a Caesarean section, there will cost an additional 1.5 million won.

And that’s just the beginning. After giving birth, some 3.6 million won will be spent for two weeks at a postpartum care center.

In contrast, in Japan, while the cost of childbirth is even higher, the government bears a higher burden of the cost. For instance, for Yasuo Hojo, 30, who will give birth next month, an ultrasound costs around 9,000 yen, or 130,000 won, four times what it costs Kim.

Hojo expects to spend a total of 10.47 million won on childbirth, but the government will bear 7.11 million won of the burden.

The biggest difference in the cost between the two countries is in the cost of postpartum care.

In Japan, after they give birth, mothers receive postpartum care at their homes through helpers supported almost entirely by the government.

On the other hand, there has been a boom in the number of postpartum care centers, or sanhujoriwon, which provide care rather unique to Korea for mothers immediately after giving birth.

According to the Ministry of Health and Welfare statistics, there are 508 postpartum care centers as of April 2012, up from 294 in 2006.

This is paradoxically a higher number than the number of obstetrics and gynecology clinics which deliver babies, which have been on the decline over the years and now number at 484.

Lee, a 31-year-old from Seocho-dong, southern Seoul, gave birth last month and received postpartum care at a posh sanhujoriwon in Gangnam District, southern Seoul.

She received care at facilities rivaling that of a five-star hotel, with massages to break down fat, full health checkups and skin treatments.

Among other things, the clinics offer the amenities of an upscale, luxury jjimjilbang, or public bathhouse. Babies are clothed in natural, organic fabric.

Two weeks of care totaled more than 10 million won for Lee.

According to the Health Ministry’s study in 2009 into postpartum care, on average 1.86 million won was spent on these postpartum care centers, which amounts to 132,000 won per day.

For other parents, getting pregnant is a difficult feat.

A 38-year-old surnamed Park, during five years of marriage, received artificial insemination three times and in vitro fertilization twice before finally getting pregnant.

Considering that her husband was 40 years old, and the challenges involved in late-age pregnancies, she quit working to focus on her pregnancy. She received a diagnosis that there was a cyst on her uterus, but because she was afraid that surgery might interfere with her fertility treatment, she didn’t remove the cyst.

“Of course it was straining on the body, and it also cost a lot as well,” said Park.

The Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service found that the number of people that are infertile or sterile is on the rise. In 2007, 141,750 women and 27,183 men were infertile, which increased to 153,046 and 39,932 last year.

According to the service, more than 3,000 women suffer from repeated miscarriages each year.

In one in three cases, the cause of infertility is unknown, according to findings from the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs in 2009. Treatment for infertility takes more than one and a half years and costs on average above 3 million won, the institute found. Even despite the investment of time and money, more than half fail in fertilization.

Since 2006, the government has been partially supporting fertilization costs. In the case of artificial insemination, the government supports as much as 500,000 won per session up to three times. The average cost for one artificial insemination session is between 150,000 and 200,000 won.

The government also provides 1.8 million won for up to four sessions for in vitro fertilization. But in vitro fertilization costs 2-3 million won per session and usually takes three to four sessions to succeed.

“There are many couples that hesitate to seek treatment for infertility because of the high costs,” said Jung Da-jeong, an obstetrician at the Gangseo Miz Medi Hospital in western Seoul. “Instead of the government limiting support for up to four sessions, they should designate an amount per patient so that they can use it as they please.”

Dr. Han Ji-eun, an obstetrician from the Cha General Hospital in Gangnam District, said, “Government support still plays a big role in lowering the wall for seeking infertility treatment.

By Shin Sung-sik, Park Yu-mi [sarahkim@joongang.co.kr]

More in Social Affairs

Honk against Moon this Saturday, lose your license

No wrongdoing by Choo or family, prosecutors find

Law firm Shin & Kim announces new recruits

Most social distancing rules to remain through Chuseok break

Greenland's melting glaciers could have far-reaching effects, including along Korea's coast

Log in to Twitter or Facebook account to connect
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
help-image Social comment?
lock icon

To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.

Standards Board Policy (0/250자)

What’s Popular Now