[Letters] Rational approach to humanitarian aid to North
Published: 23 Sep. 2012, 19:45
First, our government cannot determine the direst needs of North Korea. Currently, the two countries are in armistice, even though the situation is closer to cessation of hostilities. No citizen of South Korea is allowed to enter the North, except for a few exceptional cases. What we deem as the North’s most serious need might be lowest on their priority list. Therefore, our judgment on what to provide the North cannot be the absolute one.
Second, the South should take the North’s request into consideration to gain diplomatic leverage. Though the fundamental purpose of a humanitarian assistance is to guarantee the basic quality of life of North Koreans, improvement of the bilateral ties is the secondary goal. On the condition that the aid is not used for military purposes, what items ought to be given must reflect the North’s wants as much as possible to maximize political effects.
When Kim Il Sung passed away, former U.S. President Bill Clinton expressed condolences to the North Korean government. Considering the hostility between Washington and Pyongyang, it is understandable that people were skeptical as to why Clinton took such an action. To this reaction, he replied, “This is diplomacy.” In diplomacy, one cannot always do as it pleases and should instead rule out “emotions” between nations. Our government must take rational actions for humanitarian assistance.
by Lee Kyoung-min Student at Hankuk Academy of Foreign Studies
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.
Standards Board Policy (0/250자)