Samsung faces antitrust allegationSamsung Electronics faces a European Union antitrust complaint over its use of standard-essential patents in legal disputes with Apple, the EU’s competition commissioner said.
“We will adopt the statement of objections very soon,” Joaquin Almunia, the bloc’s antitrust chief, said at a press conference in Brussels Thursday. He said the formal notice listing antitrust concerns could be sent as soon as the end of the year. The EU is probing whether Samsung violated agreements to license key patents to other mobile-phone manufacturers on fair terms.
Samsung and Apple, the world’s two biggest smartphone makers, have traded victories in their patent disputes fought over four continents since Apple accused Asia’s biggest electronics maker of “slavishly copying” its devices.
While regulators were “happy” with Samsung’s announcement this week that it will withdraw injunctions in Europe that seek to block sales of Apple products, Almunia said the commission will continue to investigate whether Samsung’s threats to use legal action harmed competition.
“We are dissatisfied every time that we see the launching of injunctions involving standard-essential patents,” Almunia told reporters at a press conference in Brussels. “The injunctions in the Apple-Samsung case were launched; it was not only a threat.”
Samsung “is fully cooperating with the European Commission proceedings,” according to an e-mailed statement.
The company earlier this week said it would withdraw injunction requests against Apple in Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Italy and the Netherlands involving key patents it holds for wireless communications, citing “the interest of protecting consumer choice.”
The company will continue litigation that seeks damages in intellectual property disputes.
Under phone industry agreements on standards, companies owning the rights to essential technology must usually license it to competitors on fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms, known as Frand.
The EU’s reasons for taking action against Samsung will be closely watched by companies involved in licensing industry standards “on whether you can enforce a standard-essential patent and under what circumstances,” said Douwe Groenevelt, a lawyer for De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek in Brussels. The EU may weigh in on wider issues to define what Frand is and what costs should be set for using standard-essential patents.
Separately, Apple is seeking a review of the ruling from a federal appeals court in Washington, according to a filing Thursday in the U.S. District Court in San Jose, California.
U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh said Monday that while a jury found that Suwon-based Samsung infringed six Apple patents, the infringing elements were such a limited part of Samsung’s device that a sales ban wasn’t warranted. Apple hadn’t shown that consumer demand for Samsung products was driven by technology it stole, Koh said in her ruling.