After slump, Japanese corporations want their cut

Home > Business > Economy

print dictionary print

After slump, Japanese corporations want their cut

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe faces rising pressure to expand tax relief for Japan’s companies after the longest slump in business investment since 2009, setting up a potential battle with the Finance Ministry.

Officials will unveil tax breaks for capital spending in coming months, according to all 17 economists in a survey - a step backed by Finance Minister Taro Aso. Aso opposes a broader cut in corporate tax rates, even after a slide in investment since the start of 2012, and his ministry has a history of shielding revenue.

With analysts at banks from HSBC Holdings and Mizuho Securities to Royal Bank of Scotland Group predicting limited impact from steps such as accelerated depreciation allowances, lobbying may intensify for stronger action. At issue for Abe is sustaining confidence in his recipe for ending Japan’s stagnation while addressing concern about the nation’s fiscal sustainability.

“Cutting corporate tax rates will require strong political clout,” said Shigeki Morinobu, a former director of the Ministry of Finance’s tax bureau. “It’ll be a litmus test for Abenomics.”

The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry said last week that lowering the effective corporate tax rate is an “important issue,” while Abe’s coalition partner, the New Komeito party, said reductions could counter the blow to the economy from a sales-tax increase planned for April.

Business investment fell for the sixth straight quarter in the April-June period, according to preliminary GDP data released by the Cabinet Office. A separate finance ministry report showed capital spending in the second quarter was unchanged from a year earlier.

Japan’s corporate tax rate of 35.6 percent includes local and national components and compares with 25 percent in China and 17 percent in Singapore, according to the finance ministry. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development data show Japan has the second-highest rate of member nations, after the U.S. The rate is now 38 percent due to a three-year increase to fund reconstruction after the 2011 earthquake and tsunami.

At HSBC, economist Izumi Devalier says lowering the levy could help increase the metabolism of the economy, encouraging investment by overseas companies and fostering start-ups and innovation. Finance Minister Aso has argued a reduction would be ineffective because 70 percent of companies don’t pay corporate income tax.

“The Ministry of Finance looks at tax cuts like a temperance campaigner views booze sales,” said Jeff Kingston, professor of Asian studies at Temple University in Tokyo.

Abe’s Liberal Democratic Party vowed to make a “bold” reduction in its campaign for the upper-house election in July, and the prime minister said on July 4 he wants to discuss a cut to make Japan more competitive.

Already facing opposition from interest groups in areas such as health care and agriculture to changes planned under the Abenomics banner, Abe may need to consider how consumers grappling with higher prices from a sales-tax increase would react to extra aid for companies, and how much political capital to invest in pushing such a move.

The Finance Ministry convinced then-Prime Minister Noboru Takeshita to support a 3 percent sales tax in 1988 despite the potential for electoral damage, according to former METI official Jun Okumura, who now works for Eurasia Group.

Abe’s predecessor Yoshihiko Noda, who had served as finance minister, abandoned his Democratic Party of Japan’s pledge to not raise taxes by pushing through legislation for the first increase in the sales levy in 15 years. The move contributed to Noda’s ousting by Abe in December.

“As the money-keeper, MOF is able to bully other ministries,” said Koichi Nakano, professor of politics at Sophia University in Tokyo.

Abe’s growth strategy aims to get investment back to a pre-financial crisis level of about 70 trillion yen ($712 billion) per year from about 63 trillion yen in the fiscal year ended in March.

Measures to encourage capital spending may cause only a “marginal frontloading” of investment, according to Takuji Okubo, a former Goldman Sachs Group economist who’s now at Japan Macro Advisors in Tokyo. Long Hanhua Wang, an economist at Royal Bank of Scotland in Tokyo, said the effect of any tax relief for capital spending “won’t be that big.”

Nomura Securities said last week that a corporate income tax cut of 10 percentage points during the fiscal year starting April would offset most of the negative effect on the economy from raising the sales tax in two stages to 10 percent in 2015 from 5 percent now. At the same time, it would damage government efforts to tackle a ballooning national debt, making a later reduction preferable, Nomura said.

“We want corporate taxes in line with other nations,” Hiroshi Tomono, chairman of the Japan Iron and Steel Federation and president of Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corp., said in July. In an interview, Teruo Asada, chairman of Marubeni Corp., Japan’s biggest agricultural commodities trader, said that the levy is “still very high.” Bloomberg
Log in to Twitter or Facebook account to connect
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
help-image Social comment?
lock icon

To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.

Standards Board Policy (0/250자)

What’s Popular Now