Fixing the Northeast Asia Paradox
Published: 09 Sep. 2013, 21:11
Seoul National University Prof. Park Cheol-hee and Der Spiegel New Delhi bureau chief Wieland Wagner came up with the novel idea of resolving territorial and historical disputes. It is better to manage such problems in a scaled-down fashion rather than arbitrarily try to change the status quo, they said. In other words, it would be more effective to “freeze” all the thorny issues that concerned parties cannot agree on - in a sort of “bad bank.”
Some presenters highlighted the need for civil society to take the lead in paving the way for reconciliation if political leaders fail to demonstrate the outstanding leadership of Charles de Gaulle or Konrad Adenauer.
Despite diverse perspectives, attendees unanimously stressed the importance of dialogue. Professor Park underscored that no dialogue cannot be a substitute for dialogue, while Wagner emphasized the need for the Helsinki Process - the gradual implementation of cooperation in economic, scientific and technological fields between NATO and WTO members for the ultimate goal of establishing a framework for peaceful coexistence during the Cold War.
The concept - quite similar to President Park Geun-hye’s “trustpolitik” on the Korean Peninsula - could provide a meaningful turning point in deadlocked inter-Korean relations.
Participants also looked into the possibility of Northeast Asia moving toward a regional integration like the European Union. The audience also enjoyed rare access to understanding the pending issues of the region.
Northeast Asia has become the center of the world’s problems. If the unprecedented rivalry and conflicts expand, it would certainly threaten the stability of the world. We hope the forum helps provide a substantial clue to solving the conundrum.
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.
Standards Board Policy (0/250자)