Samsung wants equal treatment from Obama

Home > Business > Industry

print dictionary print

Samsung wants equal treatment from Obama

Samsung Electronics wants the same favor from President Barack Obama that he gave U.S.-based Apple - the right to keep importing smartphones and tablets found to infringe the other’s patents.

Unless the White House overturns an import ban against Samsung for infringing two Apple patents, the world’s biggest maker of smartphones will see certain older models locked out of the United States at midnight Oct. 8 Washington time.

The administration’s been in this position before. On Aug. 3, it overturned an import ban won by Samsung against older versions of Apple’s iPhone 4 and iPad 2 3G. The two companies are the biggest players in the $279.9 billion global smartphone market, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Suwon, South Korea-based Samsung says blocking one competitor’s products while letting another’s remain on the U.S. market could be seen as pro-American bias.

“It’s frustrating for Samsung - they won a big victory against Apple, or so they thought,” said Jim Altman, of Foster, Murphy, Altman & Nickel in Washington, who represents Asian companies at the U.S. International Trade Commission, which issued the import ban. “The president gets rid of it. And then Apple wins a victory and the president says ‘tough cookies?’?”

Samsung, which reported record third-quarter profit Oct. 4 based on sales of its smartphones Oct. 4, has said any ban will involve a small number of handsets.

It sold 32 percent of all smartphones worldwide in the second quarter, compared with 13 percent for Apple.

“The world is watching how Samsung is treated by the United States in this ‘smartphone war,’?” Samsung wrote Aug. 28 to Obama’s designee to review the case, U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman. “The administration has a significant interest in avoiding the perception of favoritism and protectionism.”

Froman said yesterday in Indonesia that he hasn’t decided whether to issue Samsung a reprieve. He said he has made “absolutely clear” to the company and South Korean government that decisions have “nothing, zero, to do with the nationality of the parties involved.” The decisions are made based on “policy judgments” over patents and “the appropriate use of exclusion orders in these cases,” he said.

Foreign companies are often concerned the U.S. legal system favors American companies, Altman said.

“I’ve never seen any evidence of xenophobia or ‘Get the foreigners’ or ‘Protect the Americans,’?” Altman said of patent disputes at the commission.

Obama has the power to overturn import bans issued by the ITC on public policy grounds. The administration’s decision can’t be appealed, while companies can take the underlying patent-infringement finding to an appeals court.

Jung Dong-joon, a patent lawyer with SU Intellectual Property in Seoul, says it’s unlikely Samsung will succeed. “There’s a little chance the U.S. government will veto this time amid the government shutdown there now,” Jung said. “Samsung may have to take comfort from the fact that those that will be banned are old products.”

In the Samsung case, the Apple patents are for features that the Cupertino, California-based company says differentiate the iPhone from other smartphones - multitouch technology and headphone-jack detection.

Log in to Twitter or Facebook account to connect
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
help-image Social comment?
lock icon

To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.

Standards Board Policy (0/250자)

What’s Popular Now