Samsung calls Android engineer to the standSamsung Electronics called the first of as many as seven Google witnesses to begin making its case in a $2 billion patent trial that Apple’s true target in the lawsuit is the Android operating system.
Hiroshi Lockheimer, Google’s vice president of Android engineering, testified on Friday in a federal court in San Jose, California, about the development of the Android operating system used in Samsung phones. Apple contends, and Samsung denies, that several Android features in Galaxy devices infringe the iPhone maker’s patents.
As the world’s top two smartphone makers spar at their second U.S. jury trial, Samsung is trying to show that Apple’s claims are a cloaked attack on Google in an attempt to blunt smartphone competition from Android.
Apple’s iOS smartphone operating system gained ground in the U.S. in the final quarter of 2013 as the share of the market served by the platforms of Google, Microsoft and BlackBerry shrank. Android’s share slipped 0.3 percentage points to 51.5 percent as Apple gained 1.2 percentage points to end the year with almost 42 percent of the market, ComScore said in February.
Worldwide, Samsung had 31.3 percent of a smartphone market that was valued at $338.2 billion last year, compared with 15.2 percent for Apple, whose share has shrunk as the touch-screen interface has become commonplace and Samsung, LG Electronics and Lenovo have introduced lower-cost alternatives.
Lockheimer’s opening testimony was aimed at buttressing Samsung’s argument that Google, which isn’t a defendant in the case, was more than capable of creating an operating system without copying Apple’s patents.
The executive said he joined Google in 2006 and that at the time the company was already at work on Android, which was acquired by Google in 2005. In that period, as phones were becoming smartphones, Google’s aim was to provide an open-source operating system for free.
“Rather than phones being mostly a hardware product, there was a lot of software involved,” Lockheimer said of the evolving smartphones. “We provided that software.”
Asked by Samsung lawyer John Quinn if Lockheimer’s team ever copied anything from the iPhone, the witness replied, “Not that I’m aware.”
“We like to have our own identity,” he said. “It was important that it was our ideas.”
Samsung has presented emails in which Apple co-founder Steve Jobs spoke of his Cupertino, California-based company facing an “innovator’s dilemma” and announced a “Holy War with Google,” saying the goal was to “Catch up to Google” in its Android and cloud service capabilities.
Jobs, the former Apple chief executive officer who died in 2011, is quoted in a biography by Walter Isaacson as saying his mission was “to destroy Android,” which Jobs said “ripped off the iPhone, wholesale.”
Harold McElhinny, a lawyer for Apple, told the jury in his opening argument last week that portraying the case as an attack on Mountain View, California-based Google is misleading because Samsung made the choice to use and profit from the infringing Android features in its phones.
Unlike the first trial in 2012, when Apple was awarded $1.05 billion in damages after convincing jurors that Samsung copied the iPhone’s look and design, the current case is exclusively about software functions.
Apple claims that 10 Samsung products, including the Galaxy S3, infringe five patents covering a range of user-interface designs for the iOS software that powers iPhones and iPads, including features like the slide-to-unlock function, automatic spelling corrections, and the ability for a user to make a call by clicking on a phone number within a web page or email instead of having to dial it separately.
Others functions Apple says are covered by its patents include searching for words in files stored in different apps and updating apps while using other features of the phone. Apple seeks about $2.2 billion in damages.
Samsung alleges that eight Apple products, including the iPhone 5 and versions of the iPad and iPod, infringe two patents. Samsung, based in Suwon, South Korea, seeks about $7 million in damages, according to a court filing.