Is ‘New China’ the ‘Old Japan’?

Home > Opinion > Columns

print dictionary print

Is ‘New China’ the ‘Old Japan’?

테스트

Curtis S. Chin

New York, New York - Korea, be wary, when a nation says it has your and other Asian nations’ interests at heart. That could well be the takeaway lesson from a small but powerful exhibition in New York City marking the 75th anniversary of the outbreak of World War II, at least from a U.S. perspective. And it is a lesson of particular relevance in the context of the continued economic and military rise of China, and as China’s leaders come calling on Seoul.

Japan’s wartime flag as well as those of the people, nations and admittedly colonies that imperial Japan sought to conquer are visible in the exhibit that includes an old Japanese propaganda poster from the Philippines now on display. This particular poster that caught my attention depicts parts of East and Southeast Asia, and in English, reads: “December 8th. The third anniversary of Greater East Asia War to defend Asia for and by the Asiatics. Japan’s victory is the Philippines Triumph.”

December 8th being, of course, the date from Asia’s side of the dateline of Japan’s attack on U.S. forces at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.

On display at the Grolier Club, a New York institution dedicated to appreciation of books and prints, the poster is one of many items that can be viewed until Aug. 2 in “The Power of Words and Images in a World at War.” Drawn from the collection of the Museum of World War II in Boston, the exhibition focuses on the iconic posters, broadsides, books and periodical that influenced millions in the course of the “last great worldwide conflict.”

Yet, in touring the exhibition of old words and images, a very modern, troubling question comes to mind: Does “New China” equal “Old Japan”? Or more pointedly, does China risk becoming the Japan of some seven decades past, namely a rising nation that sparks conflict and then war under the guise of “Asia for Asians”?

Trouble continues to brew in the East China and South China seas, where an increasingly assertive China, is seen, fairly or not, by many of its neighbors as a schoolyard bully, taking by force - one “salami slice” of territory at a time - what it could not through diplomacy.

The stationing of a massive floating deep-water oil rig by China into waters also claimed by Vietnam has been the latest flashpoint and tensions continue to escalate. Riots flared in Vietnam against factories and other interests perceived as being linked to China, and video footage of what seems to be a massive Chinese ship ramming and sinking a much smaller Vietnamese fishing boat has hit the Internet.

The last few months, let alone years, are no model for a way forward when it comes to dispute resolution.

Cases in point: In November of last year, China unilaterally announced an expanded air defense zone encompassing airspace that overlapped with claims by Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. And in the last few months, Chinese military planes have come dangerously close to those of the United States and Japan. China, Taiwan and Japan also all claim the Senkaku Islands, known as the Diaoyu Islands by the Chinese.

To the south, in an area that China claims is all its own, within a “nine-dash line” skirting the coasts of several Southeast Asian nations, Chinese ships now patrol a reef still claimed by and known by the Philippines as the Scarborough Shoal.

So far, China - in its rhetoric and its efforts to change the status quo - is losing the external public relations war even as its actions no doubt may play well at home amid a slowing economy and growing concerns over pollution and corruption.

Pointedly, at a recent Conference on Interaction and Confidence Building Measures in Asia (CICA) summit in Shanghai, Chinese President Xi Jinping unveiled a new “Asian Security concept,” which in essence called for Asian security to be left to Asians. China has indeed “stood up,” and a century of “humiliation” at the hands of western powers is long over, as China, the second largest economy in the world, resumes its “rightful” place in the world order.

Flash back to the 1930s and 1940s as imperial Japan’s propaganda machine exhorted Asians’ to control their own destinies and throw aside the yoke of Western colonial rule. Asia for Asians was the mantra. And better yet, Japan’s leaders argued, come join Japan in a “Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere,” where all would benefit as Japan took its rightful leadership role in the region.

Well, we all know how well that played out, as Japan’s vision of Asia for Asians led that nation and much of the Asia-Pacific region down a path to destruction. From the ashes of World War II and the Korean and Vietnam wars that followed, a new paradigm evolved with the United States helping guarantee a Pacific peace that has allowed Asia to prosper and ironically China to rise. It is that defense status quo now being challenged by China even as the United States and Japan seek to reaffirm it.

At the Asia Security Summit held recently in Singapore, also known as the Shangri-La Dialogue, U.S. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe both raised China’s ire with statements challenging China’s recent territorial moves. The United States “will not look the other way when fundamental principles of the international order are being challenged,” Hagel said. “We firmly oppose any nation’s use of intimidation, coercion or the threat of force to assert [its] claims.” Abe, in his keynote address, announced Japan’s intention to play a greater role in regional security, in ensuring open skies and sea-lanes, and in supporting Southeast Asian nations in territorial disputes with China.

Sadly, there is no third party - no respected principal on the school yard - to intervene, and in a face-saving move make clear that all sides need to let cooler heads prevail.

China should pull back its oil rig. Asean must work together now, and a clear code of conduct be established in the South China Sea even as territorial claims remain unresolved. And every nation - Japan, China and the United States included - should treat each other with respect.

With tensions mounting, it is time for all players to take a step back from the brink of even greater conflict and commit to engagement, cooperation and a peaceful resolution to disputes. The power of words and images - a force during wartime - can also be a force during times of (relative) peace. This will be essential if this century is to be one of shared peace and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region, some seven and one-half decades since the start of World War II.

*The author, a former U.S. ambassador to the Asian Development Bank (under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama), is managing director of advisory firm RiverPeak Group.

By Curtis S. Chin




Log in to Twitter or Facebook account to connect
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
help-image Social comment?
s
lock icon

To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.

Standards Board Policy (0/250자)

What’s Popular Now