Europe’s airpocalypse

Home > Opinion > Columns

print dictionary print

Europe’s airpocalypse

SINGAPORE - European policymakers like to lecture the rest of the world on air pollution. Asia, and China in particular, is a favorite target for criticism. Indeed, it sometimes seems as if no major environmental conference is complete without a presentation by European policymakers on their continent’s supposed “best practices,” which the rest of the world should emulate. When it comes to air pollution, however, Europe might consider doing less talking and more listening.

Air pollution is a growing concern across Europe. The World Health Organization has called it the continent’s “single largest environmental health risk,” estimating that 90 percent of Europe’s citizens are exposed to outdoor pollution that exceeds WHO air quality guidelines. In 2010, some 600,000 European citizens died prematurely because of outdoor and indoor air pollution, and the economic costs have been put at $1.6 trillion, roughly 9 percent of the E.U.’s GDP.

London and Paris suffer from particularly severe air quality problems. Nitrogen dioxide levels in some parts of London regularly reach two to three times the recommended limit. In the United Kingdom, air pollution kills some 29,000 people a year, putting it second only to smoking as a cause of premature death. Paris may be even worse off; in March, after air pollution levels surpassed Shanghai’s, the city imposed a partial driving ban and introduced free public transportation.

Sadly, Europe’s policymakers do not seem up to the challenge. George Osborne, the U.K.’s chancellor of the exchequer, has argued against British leadership in the fight against climate change. “We are not going to save the planet by shutting down our steel mills, aluminum smelters and paper manufacturers,” he declared in 2011.

Osborne is not alone. With European politicians arguing that introducing environmental safeguards will hurt the E.U.’s already-weakened economy, it comes as little surprise that measures to limit air pollution fall far short of the mark. The E.U.’s proposed standards regulating toxic emissions from coal plants are even less strict than China’s, Greenpeace reports. Yet, various European politicians have called for watering them down even further, with Hungary suggesting that they be scrapped altogether.

To be sure, air pollution levels in Asia are truly worrisome. The continent is home to nine of the world’s ten most polluted countries, according to Yale University’s 2014 Air Quality Ranking. New Delhi is ranked as the most polluted city on Earth, with air pollution exceeding safe levels by a factor of 60. Owing to Beijing’s unhealthy air, foreign companies pay a “hardship bonus” of up to 30 percent to employees working there.

But at least policymakers in Asia have recognized the problem and are taking steps to address it. China, for example, has declared a “war on pollution.” By 2017, Beijing - once dubbed “Greyjing” by the international media - will spend some 760 billion yuan ($122 billion) to combat air pollution.

At the heart of China’s measures are improved public transportation, green trade and a revision of the energy mix. The government has decided to install bus stops every 500 meters in city centers, reduce tariffs to 5 percent or less for a list of 54 environmental goods, and decommission many outdated and inefficient coal plants. The share of non-fossil fuels in primary energy consumption is expected to increase to 20 percent by 2030. These targets are likely to be rigorously implemented, given strong political support from the very top.

Meanwhile, in India, the state governments in Gujarat, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu are about to launch the world’s first cap and trade schemes for particulates. India’s Supreme Court even suggested an extra charge on privately owned diesel vehicles in New Delhi.

Other parts of Asia are also taking steps to improve air quality. Vietnam aims to construct eight urban rail lines in the coming years. Bangkok, which has been tackling air pollution since the 1990s, has planted 400,000 trees. And Japan is offering subsidies for hydrogen cars and creating new pedestrian-only areas.

Europe, as one of the world’s wealthiest regions, ought to be at the forefront of the effort to promote environmental sustainability. When it comes to air pollution, however, Europe’s policymakers should stop preaching to others and focus on fixing their own problems.

Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2015.

*Asit K. Biswas is distinguished visiting professor at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy in Singapore and co-founder of the Third World Center for Water Management. Julian Kirchherr is a doctoral researcher at the School of Geography and the Environment at the University of Oxford.

by Asit K. Biswas, Julian Kirchherr

Log in to Twitter or Facebook account to connect
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
help-image Social comment?
lock icon

To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.

Standards Board Policy (0/250자)