Apple loses the rights to iPhone name in China

Home > Business > Industry

print dictionary print

Apple loses the rights to iPhone name in China

Apple has lost its fight to keep the “iPhone” name exclusive to its products after a Beijing court ruled that a little-known accessories maker can use the label for a range of wallets and purses.

The ruling affirmed that Xintong Tiandi Technology (Beijing) has the right to use the name on a swath of luxury leather goods, state publication Legal Daily reported.

While Apple retains the trademark for mobile devices, the ruling defeats the company’s efforts to gain full ownership of the moniker in the world’s largest mobile market and is the second time it has lost exclusive use in China of the brand name it coined.

Xintong holds a Class 18 trademark running the gamut of leather and imitation leather goods, from smartphone cases to products that Apple has never launched, such as wallets and clutches, Legal Daily said.

The court decision upholds a 2013 ruling that centered on the fact that, when the Chinese company sought its trademark in September 2007, the iPhone had only been linked to products outside of China. Apple didn’t start selling its iconic iPhones in the country until 2009, it said.

“Apple is disappointed the Beijing Higher People’s Court chose to allow Xintong to use the iPhone mark for leather goods when we have prevailed in several other cases against Xintong,” Apple said in a statement on Wednesday. “We intend to request a retrial with the Supreme People’s Court and will continue to vigorously protect our trademark rights.”

Xintong Tiandi, which uses the all-capital IPHONE label on its products, said the decision represented a victory for free consumer markets.

The decision is unlikely to hurt Apple, which faced a similar issue over the iPad trademark. In 2012, Apple paid $60 million to Proview International Holdings to settle a dispute over the iPad name in China.

“Apple could appeal this case to the Supreme People’s Court in Beijing and they probably will,” said Ted Chwu, a partner and lawyer specializing in intellectual property at Bird & Bird in Hong Kong. “If you’ve got the budget to make a huge commercial splash then you should expect that splash to attract attention in the wrong way.”

The ruling is the latest in a series of setbacks for the world’s largest technology company in China, where its book and movie services were blocked in April for violating foreign publishing regulations.

In 2013, state media accused the company of shoddy customer service and inadequate warranties, prompting an apology from Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook.

While Chinese courts are getting better at understanding intellectual property issues, they are struggling to handle the deluge of applications from all over the world, Chwu said.

“Just keeping up with the pace of growth with the Chinese economy and the filing of trademarks as companies in China get more IP-savvy is a great challenge,” he added.

Greater China, which includes Taiwan and Hong Kong, is Apple’s largest overseas market, accounting for about 25 percent of revenue. Bloomberg

Log in to Twitter or Facebook account to connect
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
help-image Social comment?
lock icon

To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.

Standards Board Policy (0/250자)