‘Park was behind rush to conclude GSOMIA,’ says official
“The Defense Ministry’s position was to make sure the conditions were right,” a ranking official of an opposition party told the JoongAng Ilbo on Wednesday, “but it sped along negotiations in accordance with President Park’s wishes.”
Korea announced that, after four years, it plans to resume negotiations for a bilateral General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA) with Japan on Oct. 27.
Rather than seeking opposition parties’ views or public approval, the government entered negotiations with Tokyo right away. The Defense Ministry said because the two sides were close to signing the deal in 2012, there was little to discuss. Just 18 days later, the Korean Ministry of National Defense preliminarily signed the GSOMIA in Tokyo on Monday, after ending their third meeting on the issue.
Defense Minister Han has in recent parliamentary meetings defended the decision, calling it “a necessary measure in a situation where North Korea’s nuclear and missile threats are becoming a reality,” especially as Pyongyang conducted two nuclear tests this year and fired over 20 ballistic missiles.
But when Japanese Defense Minister Gen Nakatani called for a GSOMIA back in June on the sidelines of the Asia Security Summit, or Shangri-La Dialogue, in Singapore, Han replied that “conditions need to mature.”
The source added, “The Defense Ministry and the Blue House Office of National Security reported the progress of the GSOMIA negotiations to President Park, and she was to have ordered, ‘Carry on as planned.’”
He did not reveal when Park issued such orders.
“Only 15 percent of the people approve of this agreement, and the three opposition parties all requested to halt negotiations over the agreement,” the official pointed out. “The Defense Ministry has said that the conditions need to mature but is suddenly negotiating the GSOMIA, and this is a reflection of President Park Geun-hye’s wishes.”
During a press conference on Monday, Han said the intel-sharing pact was “already decided upon in the National Security Council” on Oct. 27, and that “this was not reported to the president,” implying the president was not involved in the decision.
Amid the influence-peddling scandal involving the president’s close friend, Choi Soon-sil, the opposition has demanded that Park resign.
“Rough-and-ready, backroom negotiations seem to be President Park Geun-hye’s way of saving herself,” said Rep. Ki Dong-min, floor spokesman of the Minjoo Party.
Rep. Kim Jong-dae, a lawmaker of the Justice Party and a member of the parliamentary National Defense Committee, likewise questioned whether Park is “trying to use the security issue as a front.”
In 2012, the deal fell apart due to a domestic outcry over the secretive nature of the negotiations, widespread anti-Japanese sentiment and concerns that it would estrange China.
Despite Korea’s concerns about directly sharing information with Japan, Seoul and Tokyo have been in a trilateral information-sharing arrangement with Washington since December 2014.
The three opposition parties - Minjoo, People and Justice - have demanded that the government scrap the deal and threatened they will motion to dismiss Defense Minister Han over the issue. The opposition parties will raise a motion to dismiss Defense Minister Han on Nov. 30, and are expected to vote on Dec. 2.
BY JEONG YONG-SOO, LEE JI-SANG, AND SARAH KIM [firstname.lastname@example.org]
More in Politics
DP expels Kim Dae-jung's son amid real estate scandal
Moon's buddies paid illegal salaries, says BAI
Choo says neither she nor husband requested favors for son
Moon to take part in UN events remotely