The influence of color in enforcing gender
The project started in 2005 with her 5-year-old pink-loving daughter. If she had a choice, she would always choose pink. But her daughter wasn’t the only one. Many other girls around the world crave pink dresses. On the other hand, few boys would choose to own a pink toy. Some are even teased for wearing pink.
Yoon viewed this as not just a matter of taste, but as the result of social influence. She wondered if children loved pink and blue out of instinct, or because of a social compulsion that they are not aware of.
In order to shed light on this worldwide preference, Yoon photographed girls with all of their pink possessions, and boys with all of their blue belongings.
The project recently received attention from National Geographic, an international documentary magazine, for Yoon’s portrayal of sexism. This month’s magazine deals with gender issues under the theme name “Gender Revolution.” Yoon’s project appears as one of the stories.
In the National Geographic story, Yoon is quoted as saying “I wanted to show the extent to which children and their parents, knowingly or unknowingly, are influenced by advertising and popular culture. Blue has become a symbol of strength and masculinity, while pink symbolizes sweetness and femininity.”
“Through these photos, I wanted to show the ‘color code’ that resides in our society. This might even be the result of commercial spirits that are prevalent in our capitalistic society,” she said.
The National Geographic story also quoted Jo Paoletti, a University of Maryland American studies professor, as saying “The United States has contributed significantly to the ‘pink for girls and blue for boys’ phenomenon. It’s been fueled by the pervasive color palettes of Barbie, superhero movies, and other staples of American childhood. And it has had the same kind of staying power as ‘traditional ideas about sex, gender, and sexuality.’”
BY JEONG JAE-SOOK [firstname.lastname@example.org]