Nuke commission’s role keeps getting vaguer
The issue has been controversial since the Office for Government Policy Coordination, under the prime minister’s office, said it would follow the commission’s decision. Some criticized the government for trying to avoid taking full responsibility for the decision and questioned the legal basis for allowing a second panel of people chosen by the commission to decide the fate of important state-run projects like nuclear power plants.
“The public assessment’s purpose is to find out what the public thinks about a certain policy instead of coming up with decision that will have binding power,” said Kim Ji-hyung, the commission’s chairman. “We will remain as an advisory organization that will administer the process.”
The commission added that it plans to choose a sample of about 20,000 people and divide them by age, sex and where they live. After a first assessment, the commission will pick about 350 people as members of a panel that will participate in the official public assessment. The key point of the public assessment is to see how people’s opinions change through the three-month assessment period, instead of having them choose one final decision, the commission explained.
The commission will call the members of the panel “public participants” and will provide them information on Shin Kori 5 and 6 nuclear reactors. The panel will hear from various stakeholders in the issue such as people living near the reactors. The government has allocated 4.6 billion won ($5.6 million) as a budget for the commission.
Many people living near the reactors and workers on the site want construction to continue and criticize the government for stopping it without thorough discussion with them.
The labor union of Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Corporation, which manages nuclear power plants in the country, and some scholars specializing in nuclear energy filed an injunction to suspend the commission’s public assessment process on Tuesday. They argued there is no legal basis for allowing the commission to hear public opinion on the issue in the first place and that it is the state-run energy council’s job to do so. The union plans on filing more lawsuits, possibly even with the constitutional court.
Union members said they will not follow any kind of decision coming from the commission since they don’t believe it will be fair about the issue. They don’t believe the commission will play an objective role in assessing public opinion since it is likely to follow President Moon Jae-in’s plan to wean Korea off nuclear energy.
Residents of Ulsan, where the two nuclear reactors were being constructed, also are continuing their protests against the government’s decision since it might have a negative impact on the regional economy.
BY KIM YOUNG-NAM [email@example.com]