Kim Jong-un may be in Dalian to meet Xi Jinping

Home > National > Politics

print dictionary print

Kim Jong-un may be in Dalian to meet Xi Jinping


North Korea’s Air Koryo plane lands in an airport in Dalian, China, Tuesday. [YONHAP]

North Korea leader Kim Jong-un was suspected to be on his second visit to China to meet with President Xi Jinping of China, a meeting with keen significance ahead of a planned historic summit between Kim and U.S. President Donald Trump.

Pictures and posts about heightened security in the eastern Chinese city of Dalian, 360 kilometers (223.6 miles) west of Pyongyang, the North Korea’s capital, circulated on Chinese social media sites on Monday and Tuesday.

Those security conditions were reminiscent of what the Chinese authorities put in place for Kim’s three-day visit to Beijing via train from March 25 to 28.

Pictures of an Air Koryo plane sitting at a Dalian airport and a line of luxury sedans driving through the city led to speculation that it was Kim’s entourage, less than two months after his unannounced trip to the Chinese capital.

Kyodo News Agency reported an Air Koryo plane arrived in Dalian on Tuesday, showing a photo of a white plane with a North Korean flag painted on a tail wing. There are no regularly scheduled routes between North Korea and Dalian, according to Kyodo.

The Blue House did not confirm the report Tuesday but said it was “keeping a close watch” on the situation in the Chinese port city. Seoul’s foreign ministry neither confirmed nor denied reports, saying it had nothing to say since there was no official announcement from Beijing or Pyongyang.

If Kim did make the trip, his travel is expected to be made public after his return home as was in the case in March. It was only after his return on March 28 that both China and North Korea confirmed Kim’s Beijing trip and meeting with Xi.

The reported visit comes at a sensitive time as North Korea and the U.S. are in talks preparing what will be the first meeting between the leaders of the two countries.

It also comes amidst growing questions and concerns over a possible dispute between Pyongyang and Washington over denuclearization measures that the latter demands of the former in return for sanctions relief.

A delay in announcing a date and location for the Kim-Trump meeting may suggest disagreement between the two countries. An announcement on the date and venue of the summit was expected to come out by last Friday or over the weekend.

Trump said last Tuesday that the decision would be made public “over the next couple of days.” He said Saturday his team had “the time and place all finished” and only the official announcement needed to be made.

North Korea’s criticism of the U.S. on Sunday also raised speculation that the two sides have locked horns over an agenda. The North on Sunday accused the U.S. of aggravating and “provoking” the country, citing Washington’s assertion that Pyongyang came to the April 27 inter-Korean summit because of its maximum pressure campaign and sanctions.

“This act cannot be construed otherwise than a dangerous attempt to ruin the hardly-won atmosphere of dialogue and bring the situation back to square one,” the North said in the state-controlled Korean Central News Agency.

The delay in the summit announcement comes on the heels of a slight shift in Washington’s tone about the North’s denuclearization.

Moving from its previous policy that denuclearization must be complete, verifiable and irreversible, known by the acronym CVID, Washington has in recent days been calling for PVID: Permanent, verifiable and irreversible dismantlement of North Korea’s nuclear arsenal.

That suggests more stringent requirements that will ensure North Korea loses any future ability to possess a nuclear weapon.
That would require inspection and closing down of all nuclear-related sites as well as disposal of all nuclear-related materials.

The question of what to do with numerous scientists and researchers involved in nuclear weapon program, who can number in the thousands, could be a central point to be discussed under the PVID framework.

The phrase PVID was first brought up by U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in his swearing in on Wednesday. John Bolton, a hawkish White House national security advisor echoed that phrase, agreeing with his Japanese counterpart Shotaro Yachi on Friday on the “complete and permanent dismantlement of North Korea’s weapons of mass destruction.”

North Korea may have been caught off guard by what it perceived to be excessive demands from the U.S., which also wants it to give up its ballistic missile technology and biochemical weapons.

Bolton said in an interview with CBS News airing Sunday that Washington would discuss issues on top of denuclearization such as “ballistic missile programs, their biological and chemical weapons programs, their keeping of American hostages, the abduction of innocent Japanese and South Korean citizens over the years,” a list of issues that Pyongyang could consider too much, especially ballistic missile programs that include short to medium range missile that could hit Japan.

Pyongyang’s open criticism of Washington on Sunday could have been a rebuke of the latter’s tougher stance, causing tensions ahead of the yet-to-be announced summit.

Feeling cornered, Kim made his second visit to China seeking guidance from President Xi to level the playing field, said Cheong Seong-chang, a senior fellow at the Sejong Institute specializing in North Korea affairs.

“If Kim did make the trip and met with Xi, he probably did that to ask for China’s mediation in the Kim-Trump talks,” he said, adding, “The two are likely to have discussed ways to transport the North’s nuclear and long-range missile stockpiles to China as part of dismantlement process as well as ways to strengthen bilateral military ties to compensate for the North’s security anxiety caused by its nuclear program termination.”

Log in to Twitter or Facebook account to connect
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
help-image Social comment?
lock icon

To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.

Standards Board Policy (0/250자)