Time to cut the red tapeSOHN HAE-YONG
The author is the head of the economic policy team at the JoongAng Ilbo.
In the end, the ruling party’s influence was stronger. Specifics of the plan are to be announced within the year, and the program is not enough to back innovative growth and job creation. When asked about the matter, Finance Minister Kim Dong-yeon said he hoped it could go further.
The ruling party’s rhetoric opposing civilian investment is reasonable. Sudden investment in large-scale construction projects go against the government policy trying to stabilize the real estate market. Stirring the non-stable real estate market would come at great social costs. However, the reasoning for opposing regulatory reform is not convincing. Remote medical services, carpooling and big data industries, which are already established in other countries, are blocked due to regulations in Korea. They are new industries that have proven to enhance consumer efficiency and job creation.
In the end, the policy to ask the establishment to share the burden and reach a compromise were given up, and the ruling party gave in to some hardline lawmakers, civil organizations and interest groups.
Industries grow whenever regulations are lifted. Parcel services, which had been monopolized by the postal service until 20 years ago, is the notable example. Once regulations are lifted and private companies move into the market, prices fell and delivery times were reduced. It also made the online and TV shopping industries in Korea powerful.
Gimgisa Company CEO Park Jong-hwan said that regulatory reform was a matter of survival now. Park sold navigation service Gimgisa to Kakao for 62.6 billion won ($55.9 million) in 2015. He argued, “It would not be necessary if the Korean economy thrived without regulatory reform, but that is not the reality we are in. That’s why I am calling for deregulation.” His argument sounds right.
JoongAng Ilbo, Nov. 2, Page 30