Homegrown activist hedge funds start to make their mark
Shareholder activism refers to investment methods in which shareholders increase their stake in a target company and exercise their rights to influence that company. By becoming a sizeable force, activist shareholders take “active” measures to reap profits, such as demanding dividend increases, replacing the management or even taking an active role in selling the company.
The number of local investment funds and asset management companies with activist tendencies has become increasingly notable in the local financial market.
On Nov. 15, a homegrown activist private equity firm, Korea Corporate Governance Investment, reported that it had a 9 percent stake in Hanjin Kal, the parent company of Korean Air. The news put pressure on the group, which has gone through numerous controversies in recent years including the “nut rage” and “water range” incidents caused by family members of the group’s chairman.
Last September, budding asset management company Platform Partners Asset Management demanded that the Macquarie Korea Infrastructure Fund replace its fund manager, challenging Australia-based Macquarie Asset Management.
The recent challenges made by activist shareholders are a far cry from the well-known disputes between foreign activist hedge funds and local giant conglomerate groups such as Carl Icahn against SK Group and Elliott Management’s pressure on Samsung and Hyundai Motor Group.
According to activist investment researcher Activist Insight, the number of activist hedge funds globally almost doubled from 275 in the first half of 2013 to 524 in the first half of this year.
The number of large corporations with a market capitalization above $10 billion targeted by activist hedge funds has also increased, from 115 in 2013 to 167 last year.
The driving factor behind the increase in activist hedge funds is their ability to generate high profit.
According to Hi Investment & Securities, the average earnings rate for companies invested in by activist hedge funds since 2006 is over 50 percent.
Although Korea ranks outside of the top countries that have the most activist hedge funds or companies targeted by those hedge funds, it is considered a market with high growth potential due to the changing regulatory environment that places value on shareholder return.
Recent government policies, such as the National Pension Service’s stewardship code, that demand a more responsible role from institutional investors reflect the change toward empowering shareholders.
Last year, the average dividend payout ratio for local public companies was around 16 percent, far smaller than the average 34 percent rate in Japan or 30 percent in China.
For activist hedge funds, investing in Korean companies when the dividend payout ratio is low could promise higher returns.
“Poor management by the majority shareholder and low dividend payouts, among other issues, were the causes behind the Korea discount, but activist investment may bring positive results as the majority shareholder increases dividend payouts and protects its share value,” said Platform Partners Asset Management CEO Chung Jae-hoon.
But there are also concerns that fast growth is unlikely.
“While activist investment is common abroad by foundations and institutional investors, participation by local institutional investors remains low due to its negative image of preying on companies,” said Lime Asset Management CEO Won Jong-jun, who launched the activist hedge fund Lime Democracy.
“As [shareholder activism] has become a major investment method abroad, there is a need for change in the local perception,” he added.
Shareholder activism with activist hedge funds is difficult for individual investors to participate in, however, as most activist hedge funds are private investment funds.
“There is a limit to individuals participating, as activist funds take a long time, an average of three to five years, in investing, and have complex asset management strategies,” said Kim Hu-jung, an analyst at Yuanta Securities.
There are also calls to increase the defense mechanism against the growing wave of activist investment.
“There could be risk to a company’s management stability as [activist investment] is not based on a long-term perspective but is focused on selling the stake after taking in short-term profit,” explained Yoo Jeong-ju, head of the industrial innovation team at the Korea Economic Research Institute.
“Korea could give more voting rights to certain stocks and start discussions on incorporating defensive measures such as dual class stocks that ensure control,” Yoo added.
BY CHO HYUN-SOOK, YEOM JI-HYEON [firstname.lastname@example.org]