MMCA director sets goals for term despite criticism: Youn Bummo hopes to help unify the Koreas through art exchanges
Youn, a renowned art critic, had been one of the three finalists for the director’s position, but failed to pass a practical administrative ability test for high-ranking officials in December. The only candidate who passed the test was Lee Yong-woo, former president of the Gwangju Biennale Foundation. Yet the ministry didn’t pick Lee, instead letting the other two finalists take the second test, an unprecedented move. Both passed the test and the ministry appointed Youn to the position.
It aroused allegations that the government had preselected Youn because he has been an advocate of minjung art, or social realism art that prospered in the 1980s against the military regime, and an expert in North Korean art, which falls in accordance of the current administration’s culture policies. Lee released a statement deploring the unfairness of the procedure.
Asked by the press about it, Youn said, “[Lee] is a close friend of mine, so I’m sad. But I have nothing to say about it since I’m just an appointee.”
In the meeting, Youn unveiled several goals for the museum during his three-year term, including “active inter-Korean exchanges and cooperations in art for restoration of the fragmented Korean art history [due to the division of the Korean Peninsula]” and an “expansion of the Children’s Museum [in the MMCA Gwacheon in Gyeonggi].”
“I hope art will help us go toward peace and unification,” Youn said. Yet nothing concrete has been fixed, he added, as it depends on diplomatic situations.
Youn also repeatedly said the MMCA will help “establish the identity of Korean art through projects to set up the history of Korea modern and contemporary art.” Coincidentally, the Culture Ministry said last September, “The MMCA should focus on establishing the identity of Korean art,” when it decided not to renew the former director Bartomeu Mari’s term, although the first-ever foreign director of the national museum expressed his willingness to work for another term.
Asked how a conclusion about the identity of Korean art can come out in a few years and how the art history, which is supposed to be written by art historians from diverse perspectives, can be set up by a national institution, Youn explained, “Identity could sound strong. Then, I will say it is time to review the basis of Korean art and to unify the fragmental research projects about [Korean] art history.”
BY MOON SO-YOUNG [email@example.com]