Kim orders ‘shabby’ South Korean facilities on Mt. Kumgang removed

Home > National > Politics

print dictionary print

Kim orders ‘shabby’ South Korean facilities on Mt. Kumgang removed


North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, center, talks with an official during his visit to Mount Kumgang in this photo released by the state media Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) on Wednesday. [YONHAP]

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un ordered the complete removal of South Korean-built tourist facilities on Mount Kumgang, declaring the resort is no longer an emblem of inter-Korean cooperation, according to state media on Wednesday.

He also called the South Korean facilities tacky and “shabby.”

Kim’s bombshell instructions, delivered during a tour of the Mount Kumgang resort, were a repudiation of one of the two main economic ventures between the two Koreas⁠— the other being the Kaesong industrial park⁠— and a major departure from the inter-Korean policies of his father and the regime’s previous leader, Kim Jong-il.

After inspecting various hotels and tourist facilities, Kim panned the aesthetic quality of the buildings, which he labeled as “not only very backward in terms of architecture but look so shabby as they are not taken proper care of,” according to an English-language report from the North’s official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA).

This was followed by a “sharp criticism of the very wrong, dependent policy of the predecessors who were going to rely on others when the country was not strong enough” — a seeming condemnation of his father’s decision to partner with the South Korean company Hyundai Asan in 1998 to attract South Korean tourists to the area.

Kim then “instructed to remove all the unpleasant-looking facilities of the south side with an agreement with the relevant unit of the south side” and ordered their replacement with “new modern service facilities” built “our own way” that would complement the mountain’s natural scenery.

North Korea will “always welcome our compatriots from the south” if they want to visit Mount Kumgang, Kim added, but “what is important is for our people to have the shared view that it is not desirable to let the south side undertake” development of the resort.

Starting in 1998, South Korean tourists visited the scenic mountain resort in the thousands, first by cruise ships and then by land through the demilitarized zone. In July 2008, however, a female South Korean tourist was shot and killed by a North Korean guard at the resort, leading Seoul to suspend all tours, followed by the North’s expulsion of South Korean workers from the area.

With the two Koreas’ other big joint project, the Kaesong Industrial Complex, shuttered after a nuclear test by Pyongyang in 2016, cross-border cooperation came to a halt as the North concentrated on bulking up its nuclear weapon and missile capacities.

Yet the potential for a revival of the twin projects — in which the South’s property investments remained intact, albeit unmanaged — looked ripe as inter-Korean ties warmed up last year. When South Korean President Moon Jae-in traveled to Pyongyang for his third summit with Kim in September, the two leaders jointly pledged to normalize the two projects.

But Washington forbids any economic exchanges between the Koreas as long as the North’s nuclear program remains. North Korea, for its part, stepped up its pressure on the South throughout this year, regularly using its Foreign Ministry and state media to accuse Seoul of betraying inter-Korean commitments by kowtowing to foreign powers.

Kim’s order to remove South Korean investment in Mount Kumgang could mark a fundamental pivot in the North’s inter-Korean policy, showing that the regime is no longer willing to wait for Seoul to get serious.

The lack of reciprocation from the South after Kim announced he was willing to restart the Kaesong Industrial Complex and Mount Kumgang tours “at any time” in his New Years’ Address in January may have induced Pyongyang to abandon confidence in South Korea.
Testifying to this was Kim’s overt denial that the Mount Kumgang tourist zone is a “common property of the north and the south and it is the symbol and epitome of the north-south relations, and that the tour of Mt Kumgang would not be possible without the development of the north-south ties,” notions which he said were based on a “misguided understanding.”

Instead, Kim asserted that Mount Kumgang “is our land won at the cost of blood and even a cliff and a tree on it are associated with our sovereignty and dignity,” again slamming past party officials for having “thoughtlessly allotted” land in the tourist zone to the South for development.

Kim expounded on his goals to connect Mount Kumgang to a larger belt of tourist zones that includes the Masikryong Ski Resort – one of Kim’s first major construction projects since he took power in 2011 – and the Wonsan-Kalma coastal tourist area, a beachside resort under development that was reportedly the subject of a major investment offer from the United States during bilateral denuclearization negotiations in Stockholm earlier this month.

The South Korean government on Wednesday appeared to be taken aback by the North’s sudden announcement, with various officials stressing that it was necessary to first verify Pyongyang’s real intentions aside from the KCNA report.

Seoul’s top inter-Korean official, Unification Minister Kim Yeon-chul, acknowledged that inter-Korean relations were in a “serious” situation that was “certainly not good” but added more analysis was needed before interpreting Kim Jong-un’s remarks as a true change in Pyongyang’s inter-Korean policy.

The ministry’s spokesman, Lee Sang-min, said at a press briefing that Seoul would be open to discussions at any time upon the North’s request in order to revive Mount Kumgang tours and protect the property of its citizens in the area, all of which have either been frozen or confiscated, he added.

Log in to Twitter or Facebook account to connect
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
help-image Social comment?
lock icon

To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.

Standards Board Policy (0/250자)