Subsidies for foreign companies?

Home > Opinion > Fountain

print dictionary print

Subsidies for foreign companies?

KIM DONG-HO
The author is an editorial writer of the JoongAng Ilbo.

While we rave over Tesla, the shadow drawn over the electric car ecosystem in Korea is growing. In the first half of the year, Tesla has the biggest market share in the Korean electric car market, ahead of Hyundai. In the first half, 7,080 cars were sold, a 17-fold increase from the same period last year. This itself is not an issue. But what about Tesla taking the electric car subsidiaries paid with tax money?

Tesla received 90 billion won ($759 million) in electric car subsidies from the central and local governments this year, acquiring 43 percent of total subsidies. Hyundai Motor, which will introduce a new Ionic range, received 64.4 billion won while Kia Motors received 30.5 billion won. Electric buses are not much different. While a Chinese electric bus company took 5.9 billion won in subsidies, Hyundai Motors received 4.9 billion won.

I have a series of questions here. When only Tesla is having fun among electric car makers, what about hydrogen vehicles? The origin of my curiosity is President Moon Jae-in’s declaration in April 2019 that system semiconductors, bio-health and future automobiles would be selected as three core innovative industries for the future. President Moon has been frequently visiting such industrial sites.

But I find the future vehicle industry questionable. Just like electric cars, I am afraid Korean hydrogen cars won’t get much attention. Hydrogen vehicles are the future of automobiles. Electric cars seem to be the mainstream because of Tesla. But hydrogen technology is appropriate not only for sedans but also for trucks and buses that require more power. Once electric cars are settled, hydrogen cars will likely continue to boom. So I have doubts and concerns as only foreign companies would benefit in the hydrogen car industry, as in the electric car industry.

The signs are becoming reality already. The Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy designated Hyundai Rotem as the hydrogen recharge infrastructure business in May. The problem is that this company chose Japanese company Osaka Gas’ technology instead of Korean technology. In the bidding, indigenous technology that the Korea Institute of Energy Research invested 20 billion won to develop was not chosen.

Hydrogen cars, which are directly related to the future vehicles that the government named as the three next-generation innovative industries, are faltering from the beginning. In January 2018, the government announced a road map to vitalize the hydrogen economy. The plan outlines producing 6.2 million hydrogen cars, while building 1200 charging stations to create 420,000 jobs by 2040.

We are currently engaged in a war of materials, parts and equipment with Japan. It is a comedy that Korean technology is neglected and Japanese technology selected to nurture the fabled hydrogen economy.

Last month, Hyundai Motors mass-produced hydrogen trucks for the first time in the world and exported them to Switzerland from the Gwangyang Port in South Jeolla, but the core parts were made by foreign companies instead of Korean technology. The government must thoroughly review where this problem originated.



Log in to Twitter or Facebook account to connect
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
help-image Social comment?
s
lock icon

To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.

Standards Board Policy (0/250자)

What’s Popular Now