What are project financing loans all about?
However, construction companies’ difficulties are not isolated. Industry experts say their troubles could create a domino effect that might topple the economy.
If construction companies fail to pay back their project financing, or PF, loans on time, local banks and other financial institutions that lent them the money will also experience difficulties. If this occurs, Korea could witness a financial crisis as banks and other financial institutions face liquidity problems.
So then, what exactly is project financing?
When lending money to someone, most people first consider whether or not they can get their money back from the borrower. If the chances of making this happen are slim, nobody is willing to lend money. For this reason, when people with poor credit want to borrow from banks, they must secure the loan with collateral such as land or a house.
If the borrower fails to pay back the loan, the property used as collateral becomes the bank’s property.
But project financing is quite different from ordinary loans. These loans do not require people or companies to put up collateral. With project financing, if a certain project has the potential to create large profits, banks or financial institutions provide loans regardless of credit history. If the project goes well, banks or financial institutions cash in. Because of this, the most important factor for banks and financial institutions when deciding to approve PF loans is a project’s potential. Accordingly, lenders carry out thorough checks before making the decision to lend.
According to industry officials, project financing dates back to 1856. When Egypt built the Suez Canal, the country adopted PF loans for the first time in the world.
After that, developing countries started to use PF loans when they borrowed money from industrialized countries for infrastructure projects such as building bridges and highways.
These days PF loans are also provided by the nation’s banks to local companies.
In fact, project financing was widely used by construction companies after the 1997 Asia financial crisis. After the crisis, there were many people who wanted to purchase apartments but supply was failing to meet demand, and apartment prices suddenly soared. Once an apartment was built, a multitude of people would queue up to buy.
In this environment, apartment projects were regarded as a golden goose for construction companies.
In order to capitalize on this boom, many construction companies jumped into the apartment business. But they were in need of bank loans to carry out their projects.
Large construction projects are usually built by a consortium of a property developer and a builder.
Property developers are usually owners of land or a smaller company that has an idea for a construction project but does not have the resources to secure large loans from banks.
For banks, it is a huge loss not to provide loans to property developers because the loans pay high interest rates. But banks are not allowed to provide loans for people or companies that do not meet certain financial criteria.
That’s where project financing steps in.
Property developers create a paper company and invest their money in land where a building or apartment complex will be built. Then, banks provide loans to the paper company. If the company fails to pay back the loan, builders guarantee that they will complete the construction project anyway. Builders also promise that they and not the developers will pay back the loans in a worst-case scenario.
For banks, project financing loans are doubly tempting because they get their money back with high interest when apartments are sold, and they later provide loans to people who want to buy the recently built apartments.
Over the past couple of years, the nation’s housing market has prospered, and there were no reasons for banks to deny project financing loans.
During the building boom, banks didn’t even look into the business proposals of developers and builders too carefully. Securities and savings banks, which jumped into PF loans later than banks, even offered project financing to unstable property developers, believing the apartments would be quickly snapped up once they were built.
In 2000, the total amount of PF loans was estimated at around 1 trillion won ($773.9 million).
This June, it was more than 60 trillion won.
But the local housing market has started to see changes. In order to counter skyrocketing housing prices, the central government imposed restrictions on the local housing market.
Among these, getting excessive loans from banks was prohibited, and people were not allowed to resell their houses until a certain period of time had passed.
Now as the U.S.-led financial turmoil spills into the real economy, not many people have been able to purchase houses. And this has caused apartment prices to fall.
If apartments are not sold, project developers will default on their loans. So the debt burden goes to the builders who guaranteed to pay back loans instead of the developers.
The result of this phenomenon has seen small and mid-sized builders going out of business. Even banks and financial institutions are under financial risk because they aren’t receiving money from property developers and builders.
When banks and financial institutions face a liquidity shortage, they are reluctant to lend money to individuals, which causes large-scale economic problems.
As project financing surfaces as a problem, there have been rumors that some construction companies are going bankrupt.
Most of the rumors turned out to be false, but Shinsung Engineering and Construction and C & Woobang Construction collapsed.
Shares in construction companies have also nose-dived. Even foreign securities’ firms say Korean banks and financial institutions that provided project financing loans to construction companies are financially unstable.
In order to cope with the potential crisis caused by ailing construction companies, local banks made up an association of creditors. If banks suddenly urge construction companies to pay back their loans, the builders might go out of business, so the association is looking at alternative ways to collect debt.
The association originally created a standard to sort construction companies into four levels. Companies that have temporary liquidity problems but a stable financial structure are labeled as A and B. For A and B companies, banks extend due dates and offer additional loans if the construction companies need them.
However for companies labeled as C, banks provide additional loans only when the builders sell some of their properties to secure liquidity.
Companies labeled as D, however, will not be rescued because they are seen as being inviable.
But construction companies are reluctant to ask the association for help. Only 30 construction companies have registered so far, and all of them are small or mid-sized. Builders say if they register, it becomes public that they are having financial difficulties, which will hurt their share prices and reputation.
The association of creditors later adopted looser standards for helping construction firms because so few builders applied for the original rescue plan.
By Choi Hyeon-chul JoongAng Ilbo [email@example.com]