중앙데일리

We must overhaul the public sector

May 22,2019
Mok Young-man
The author is a guest professor at Konkuk University.

President Moon Jae-in has entered the third year of his five-year term. But the government still neglects administrative reforms. Public-sector reform is one of the first tasks that new governments started to tackle in the past. The tradition helped keep in check the outsized growth of government and public or semi-public enterprises.

Such moves were carried out by both liberal and conservative governments over the last two decades under Presidents Kim Dae-jung, Roh Moo-hyun, Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye. Administration reform is a persistent challenge for governments around the world. The United States, Britain and other states have repeatedly undergone administrative reforms.

The public sector tends to swell if it is not kept in check. If it is not contained in the early stage of a new government, its disproportionate growth causes inefficiency and unnecessary cost. Inefficacy in state governance inevitably raises the tax burden. It is therefore an essential task for governments to address the problem.

Public-sector reform has hardly been mentioned under the Moon administration. Rationalization starts with streamlining public organizations.
The public expects speedy and efficient public services, yet the Moon Jae-in administration has made no effort to restructure or reorganize the public sector to seek a balance between the public and private sectors.

The government has only become bigger through increased hiring as a means to bolster job numbers. The public sector has expanded while administrative reforms have disappeared. The government has stretched its influence into the corporate sector, undermining the free market.

On a visit to Incheon International Airport Corporation just two days after his election on May 10, 2017, President Moon Jae-in vows to eliminate contract jobs in the public sector. [JOINT PRESS CORPS]
The government gets involved in market activities as if it is on a mission to enforce justice on the market because it has a deep-rooted distrust of free market forces. Governments around the world are doing the opposite — restructuring and curtailing the public role to allow more freedom in the market. Only the Korean government is going against global trends.

A bigger public sector is not always wrong. But efficiency and productivity must follow. A bigger public sector must be able to provide better and greater services at lower costs. Yet there are few such cases among the expanded public role at home and abroad. If efficiency is guaranteed, all governments would opt to increase the public sector as an easy means to prop up jobs.

An increase in government employees lessens employment in the private sector. The cost of sustaining a government employee, which is financed by tax revenues, could generate double or triple the effect in employment when spent on the private sector. There is a huge gap in productivity between the public and private sector. The enlargement of the public sector, which usually has low productivity, eats up the gross national product. It is a doom for the nation and future generation.

We must return to a society of common sense and basics. The state cannot solve everything. It must keep its influence to a minimum. It must stay away from areas it cannot help, or where it will do more harm than good. The government will face backlash if it further neglects administrative reform.

Translation by the Korea JoongAng Daily staff.

JoongAng Ilbo, May 21, Page 28


dictionary dictionary | 프린트 메일로보내기 내블로그에 저장