No spring yet for Korea’s frozen real estate market
Although the government could come up with some relief measures soon, analysts said policies that would be most effective in breathing life into the market have a slim chance of seeing the daylight, as they could exacerbate what is already a high amount of debt in Korean households.
According to the Seoul government’s apartment sales data analyzed by property data provider Dr. Apt., the number of apartments exchanging hands in Seoul during the first quarter of this year fell to 8,839 transactions, the lowest since 2006 when such information was first made public, and half of the number during the first quarter of 2011.
Such a slump is atypical for Korea, where the combination of elections and the springtime moving season has lifted the real estate market in the past. But unlike during the 2004 and 2008 general elections, when politicians promised “new town” developments, the National Assembly candidates in the recent campaign barely raised issues related to real estate and property prices.
Real estate is the main asset in the average Korean household, accounting for 56.5 percent of total assets, according to 2011 Statistics Korea data.
Because it was standard practice to take out mortgages to buy real estate as prices steadily rose before the 2008 international financial crisis, the country has an estimated 1,000 trillion won ($883 billion) in national household debt and an ever-increasing strata of “house poor” people: families who spend a large proportion of their income on mortgage payments and have little left to spend elsewhere.
Analysts say the new National Assembly beginning its term on May 30 is unlikely to jumpstart the market.
Measures announced by the government all but failed to be passed by the previous parliament, including: removing the upper limit on certain housing prices; abolishing the heavy income tax rate applied when owners of multiple houses sell a house; plus ending for two years the 50 percent tax on any excess profit from reconstructed houses.
Although analysts viewed some measures as more likely to pass than others, most expected the ruling Saenuri Party to have a hard time easing regulations.
“The main legal revisions under dispute, such as abolishing heavy income tax rates for homeowners of multiple houses, can stir up controversy as tax cuts for the rich,” said Kim Ji-yeon, a researcher at Real Estate No. 1, another property data provider. “Saenuri will have difficulty in proactively easing housing regulations before the presidential election.”
With political parties’ general election pledges having focused on providing housing support for low-income households rather than encouraging market transactions, analysts are looking to the government for more follow-up measures since easing housing regulations six times last year.
“We welcome that housing prices have stabilized, but frozen transactions are not ideal,” Finance Minister Bahk Jae-wan said last week. “The government will release measures that keep prices down but reinvigorate transactions.”
While the government is likely to ease some housing sales regulations for three popular southern Seoul districts - Gangnam, Seocho and Songpa - analysts said it is less likely to lower the 40 percent cap on debt-to-income ratios or loan-to-value ratios on mortgages to keep snowballing household debt under control.
By Lee Jung-yoon [email@example.com]