Researchers are in hot pursuit of new technologies, future profits

Home > Business > Economy

print dictionary print

Researchers are in hot pursuit of new technologies, future profits


On a drizzly September day in Daejeon, staff members at the Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) demonstrate wearable products they have been developing.

A young researcher with a watchlike device strapped to his wrist makes a fist and flexes a muscle. As he rolls his fist and applies some pressure, a cursor on a huge TV monitor clicks and accesses the Internet, tracking his hand gestures.

“We use motion sensor technology in executing commands,” says Jeong Hyun-tae, director of ETRI’s wearable computing research department. “This device was actually used on MBC’s live broadcast coverage of local elections earlier this year.”

He says the on-air host who wore the device accessed or uploaded data related to the election.

Unlike Microsoft’s Xbox or Sony’s PlayStation, this smartwatch-type device doesn’t require a separate sensor that reads motions by a person in front of the screen. It allows more freedom of movement and doesn’t force the wearer to face the monitor in order to initiate commands.

“The MBC host even turned his back to the monitor while operating the wearable device,” says Jeong. “If you used Microsoft’s Kinect, you would need several dozen installed across the studio.”

The key to this wearable technology, he says, is notifying the device when a command starts and ends.

“At the moment, the technology is customized for a specific individual,” says Jeong, “and we’re working on making it so anyone can use it without having to reset the system.”

The device looks dull and bulky compared to Samsung Electronics’ Galaxy Gear and the upcoming Apple Watch.

With no digital display or apps, it’s clearly not a smartwatch. It most closely resembles a toy watch for children.

Even the square block above the strap looks crooked. Jeong says it is a prototype that is still under development.

However, the technology is scheduled to be transferred to a local small or midsize smartwatch developer that will fine-tune the product for commercial sale.

The director says his research team has been working on wearable digital devices since 2004. They have used digital devices and technologies on fabrics and even moved on to ones that are applied directly to the skin like a Band-Aid.

One of the projects the institute worked on several years ago was creating a suit that would automatically connect a smartphone and the person wearing the suit, who could play music or pick up calls by touching a digital board on the sleeves rather the device itself.

The project never made it to the stores.

Ironically, the fashion department of Cheil Industries last month unveiled a men’s business suit that uses near-field communication technology. The company’s Rogatis Smart Suit 2.0 automatically unlocks a smartphone when it is removed from the jacket and switches the device to vibration mode when it is replaced.

“Just three to four years ago, interest in wearable devices was low, but interest has grown exponentially,” says Jeong.

In a building not far from the wearable device research department, a team specializing in developing the Internet of Things (IoT) demonstrates a disposable heart rate monitor.

Two magnetlike devices are attached to a circular band and are positioned on the chest. The heart rate appears on the smartphone in a few seconds. In addition to tracking the pulse, the device records the sound of the heartbeat and compiles and stores the data.

“This is a glimpse of just a few of the technologies we are working on,” says Lee Kang-bok, director of the IoT application research team. “IoT is more than just connecting one device to another. That’s just scratching the surface.

“IoT is about compiling data and sharing information. Wearable devices and big data are just parts of a larger picture.”

Today, research teams in public and private institutions across the country are working to produce the kinds of new IT devices and software that will secure a future growth engine for Korea.
The intensifying search for the next big IT product or system comes against the backdrop of unprecedented challenges for a Korean economy that once thrived on the ICT industry.

Apple, Google and other U.S. companies from Silicon Valley dominate the global software market with a solid footing in the ecosystems they have created, and smart devices are becoming more dependent on the operating systems and apps developed by such companies. At the same time, Chinese IT enterprises are threatening Korean companies’ hardware business, while service companies like Alibaba and Tencent have expanded aggressively.

Even Korea’s biggest tech conglomerate, Samsung Electronics, is feeling the pinch. The company’s operating profit in the third quarter wasn’t as severe as some projected, but it shrank by more than half compared to the same quarter a year ago. It managed - barely - to stay above 4 trillion won ($3.76 billion), thanks to its thriving computer chip business.

However, the real challenge for tech companies is identifying, developing and exploiting future businesses that will compensate for the declining profits of smartphones.

Market experts agree the next big revolution in the IT industry will involve IoT and wearable devices.

With the world’s first smartwatch released by Samsung Electronics a year ago and the Apple Watch due in early 2015, the wearable and IoT markets have grabbed headlines and interest has spiked. Research agency IDC projected that the IoT market will hit $7.1 trillion in 2020, compared to $1.9 trillion last year.

“Businesses are taking the necessary steps to gain a deeper understanding of the IoT and its overall value,” says Vernon Turner, senior vice president at IDC. “Technology vendors are evolving their solutions in a supply-driven market that’s edging toward becoming a more demand-driven market.”

The IDC report noted that the two biggest tech companies - Apple and Google, both based in Silicon Valley - are locked in a fierce competition for IoT supremacy, which includes mergers and acquisitions.

“The enormous impact that the introduction of the smartphone has brought to the market is still fresh in the minds of suppliers, and for that reason the manufacturers are showing their determination to prepare, one way or another, to take the lead in the IoT, which is considered the new mega trend,” says Lee Jong-geun of the LG Economic Research Institute.

The LG researcher cites recent moves by Google and other global IT companies.

“Google, earlier this year during its developer conference in San Francisco, announced its initiative ‘Android Everywhere,’ where everything will be connected, whether through a wearable like a smartwatch or a system installed in cars,” he says. “The company talked about how most of the surroundings to which consumers are exposed will be connected to a Google platform, where real-time weather and traffic information, and schedule management and even health management, will be provided whenever and wherever.”

Apple executives have made similar comments about taking the lead in the global IoT market through the company’s home kit and health kit.

“Apple’s introduction of Swift, a computer programming language, should be given serious attention,” says Lee. “Why introduce Swift when one can still make an OS app with existing objective C programming language? It seems Apple is trying to secure the IoT ecosystem earlier than its competition by providing a programing language whereby you don’t need to be an expert in software engineering to create an app. It is creating an environment that can generate a wide variety of apps from a larger pool of developers.”

He says that when it secures this environment, Apple will be able to easily create its own Apple IoT ecosystem.

Korean businesses also are jumping in the race. The two biggest IT companies - Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics - unveiled products that could utilize IoT technology last month at the IFA in Germany, Europe’s largest consumer electronics exhibition.

In addition, Samsung has been trying to strengthen its non-smartphone businesses by expanding in B2B and IoT services, holding several software and open-source developers’ forums in recent months.

But without a proper ecosystem, many local IT companies have been struggling.

According to Korea’s Institute of Information and Communications Technology Promotion, several local IT companies - including LG CNS, Shinsegae I&C and Daekyo CNS - recently shuttered their digital content businesses as Google and other global companies dominate the market.

Jeong of ETRI says Korean companies, especially conglomerates, have been too conservative in their research and development efforts.

“The questions is who is going to take the lead” in the next IT market, says the senior researcher. “Although we take pride in being a strong IT country, I think we failed to prepare properly. Our IT industry is still centered on hardware and devices. Just take smartphones. We have the largest share of the global market, but Android and Apple’s iOS are dominant in the economy, which is a huge difference.

“From the first Galaxy smartphone to the Galaxy Gear, Samsung’s devices use Android, and even LG, which manufactures well-designed high-end smartphones, is just among the many Android brands in the market.”

Even though there has been some criticism that there is nothing innovative about Apple’s first smartwatch, says Jeong, it is undeniable that Apple continues to expand its ecosystem with the device. The same can’t be said for Samsung Electronics, which was, in fact, the first IT company in the world to commercialize a smartwatch.

“I think we’re working backward,” he says. “First we create a device and then start to find a purpose the device can serve. It should be the other way around.”

The market researcher said that unlike other companies from the United States and even China, which is rising as a new threat, Korean conglomerates have been reluctant to pull the trigger on acquisitions of outstanding small and midsize technology companies.

“Here in Korea, when we mention M&As, we tend to have a negative tone,” says Jeong. “It should be like it is in the case of companies in the United States and China.”

According to an IITP report, in the first nine months of this year, Google acquired 29 IT companies. Apple and Facebook bought seven companies each, and Yahoo secured 13 companies.

And Chinese companies in recent years have become ever more aggressive in securing outstanding IT companies.

In 2009, Chinese companies bought only 13 U.S. IT companies. Last year, that figure nearly tripled to 36.

Companies like Alibaba, Tencent and Baidu have not been hesitant about using their massive financial resources to aggressively invest in U.S. IT companies that can give them an edge in the global market.

But in the case of Korean companies, the figures have been shrinking.

Overall, the industry’s M&As dropped from 811 in 2010 to 400 last year.

Samsung has made only three M&As this year, though they were companies that specialize in app services and IoT.

“Korean conglomerates until now have been relying on a business model that completed or upgraded successful business technologies, instead of creating a new technology or business model,” says Jeong. “They have been trying to make money easily. This should change and they must be more bold and aggressive by funding or securing small and midsize companies that have potentially profitable business models and technology.”

BY Lee ho-jeong []
Log in to Twitter or Facebook account to connect
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
help-image Social comment?
lock icon

To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.

Standards Board Policy (0/250자)