Hyundai, Kia will stay in China
After Emart, a discount chain under Korean retail giant Shinsegae, left China earlier this year, Lotte Mart also decided to finally call it quits and exit the market last week.
Korean companies selling products in China have taken a blow due to the retaliation by the Chinese government and its consumers over Seoul’s decision to deploy a U.S.-led antimissile system.
Beijing ratcheting up pressure on Korean companies has also taken a toll on the sales of Korean auto makers.
Since the retaliation began earlier this year, sales of Hyundai and Kia have taken a nosedive - slashed by nearly 50 percent compared to a year earlier.
During the first six month of 2016, Beijing Hyundai, Hyundai’s Chinese unit, posted 9.6 trillion won ($8.5 billion) in sales.
This figure plummeted to 4.6 trillion won during the first half of 2017. For Kia’s Chinese unit Dongfeng Yueda Kia, sales fell from 4.6 trillion won to 1.7 trillion won during the same period.
In terms of sales volume for the month of August alone, Hyundai and Kia sold 124,116 vehicles last year in China.
Despite the gloomy figures, the duo will stay put in China, at least for now. For one thing, their contracts with Chinese counterparts prevent them from pulling out without the consent of their local partners.
Beijing Hyundai was created through a 50-50 joint venture between Hyundai Motor and BAIC Motor. Dongfeng Yueda Kia is the result of a joint venture between Kia Motors and local auto companies Dongfeng Motor Corporation and Yueda Group. Kia owns 50 percent of the unit while Dongfeng and Yueda each own 25 percent.
“Although we cannot fully disclose the details of the contract due to confidentiality, there is a clause in the contract that a company cannot break the contract unilaterally,” said a spokesperson from Hyundai Motor Group, which owns Hyundai Motor and Kia Motors.
The decision-making structure prevents Hyundai and Kia from making a unilateral decision. For instance, the chief executive of Beijing Hyundai is appointed by the Korean company, while the chairman of the board of directors is appointed by BAIC. Companies also share an equal number of directors on the board. For Beijing Hyundai, 50 percent of the members of the board of directors are appointed by Hyundai while the rest are assigned by BAIC. The same goes for Dongfeng Yueda Kia.
“We have no intention of closing down our business in the Chinese market,” said the spokesperson from the group. “We are certain that partner companies feel the same way.”
Aside the management structure and contractual obligations, it would be a big loss for Hyundai and Kia if they pulled out of China, the world’s No.1 auto market. For Hyundai and Kia, about 20 percent of their total sales are normally generated in China.
Local partners may also lose out, some analysts speculate.
“With top global carmakers operating in the Chinese market already [through joint ventures with other partners], it would be difficult for BAIC to find a partner like Hyundai,” said Lim Eun-young, an analyst from Samsung Securities.
If the companies leave China, the five-trillion-won investment that they poured in during the past 15 years may also go to waste.
In addition, some 150 Korean parts makers, including Hyundai affiliates Hyundai Mobis and Hyundai Wia, may suffer if the duo retreats. Most of the Korean parts makers have entered the Chinese market with Hyundai and Kia to directly supply their local production plants. For instance, about 26 percent of the sales of Hyundai Mobis come from its Chinese unit. This means poor performance in China would immediately reflect on the company’s balance sheet. Hyundai Kia has already turned red during the first half this year.
“If local production fails to meet even half of the total capacity, there is no guarantee that Hyundai and Kia will not follow a similar fate to Lotte Mart,” said Han Jang-hyun, a professor of automotive engineering at Daeduk University.
Tire companies and battery makers are also monitoring the situation in China.
A part of Kumho Asiana Group Chairman Park Sam-koo’s self-rescue plan for Kumho Tire submitted last week was to sell off stakes of the tire company’s Chinese corporations. Park said the Thaad retaliation was one of the reasons behind the proposal. Korean battery makers have also been excluded from government subsidies in China since last year. While the Chinese government decided to grant subsidies to come 2,500 batteries by some 180 companies this year, cars using batteries made by Korean companies such as Samsung SDI and LG Chem were left out.
BY MOON HEE-CHUL [email@example.com]
More in Industry
No dial tone for 2G services on LG U+ starting in June
Ironing out an air corridor took decades
Kia reinvents itself, promising 'movement that inspires'
Hanwha Energy teams up with France's Total in U.S.
Scatter Lab investigated, but not for odd messages