Regulation in excess
Published: 03 Apr. 2019, 19:38
Regardless of the purpose of the probe, the act clearly violates privacy and telecommunication freedom. The ministry claimed it was not regulating or censoring private group chat rooms. But the internet has already gone abuzz over the move which is the equivalent of spying on people’s private lives under the pretext of preventing sex crimes.
Jin Sun-mee, the gender minister, is also self-contradictory in pushing the campaign. In a filibuster address as a lawmaker, she strongly protested the conservative ruling party’s anti-terrorism law for fear of infringing on phone privacy.
“[Using] my phone, I have private conversations with my loved ones and gossip with my friends. I have private memos and confidential information. If the spy law passes, my private life would be exposed. We cannot have secret police watching over our head,” she said.
In February, the liberal Moon Jae-in administration also launched measures to regulate the server name indication (SNI) that allows multiple hostnames to be served over HTTPS from the same IP address in order to restrict access to illicit sites. It blocked as many as 900 websites, claiming they contained illicit materials and contents. That is an action only thought to be possible under rigid state control in a place like China.
Preventing and fighting sex crimes is important. But resorting to online regulations goes against the freedom of expression.
Korea is dangerously veering toward becoming a regulatory powerhouse.
JoongAng Ilbo, April 3, Page 30
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.
Standards Board Policy (0/250자)