After historic win, DP eyes new real estate policy
Lawmakers are expected to soon begin discussing proposals for a comprehensive real estate tax increase, with the goal of passing a bill before the current session ends at the end of May. The quick turnaround would allow the new rules to be applied before the June 1 deadline, when property taxes are levied.
The new proposals follow recent increases to the government’s assessed values of real estate.
The government is currently proposing increasing the maximum property tax for people who own a single apartment from 2.7 percent to 3 percent. For those with multiple apartments, the tax rate would increase from 3.2 percent to 4 percent.
The government is also pushing to raise the maximum tax that could be levied on owners of two or more apartments in areas it has designated as speculative or overheated. In the case of Seoul, that’s every district.
Under current law, the government can’t tax a property more than double that of the previous year. The government’s proposal would raise that limit to 300 percent of the previous year’s tax burden.
Of that total, 63.2 million won in taxes would result from the increase in the assessed values, and the 7.93 million won from the increase in the comprehensive real estate tax rate, according to Woo’s calculations.
Under that scenario, the tax burden would more than double from the previous year. The existing cap would limit this year’s payment to 200 percent of the property owner’s 2019 taxes, but if the cap is lifted, the owner would be responsible for what amounts to 236 percent of the previous year’s tax bill.
Additionally, the government is proposing another increase to its assessed real estate values. Currently, the government assesses the value of real estate at well below the market price.
Earlier this year, the government increased the assessed-value rates to equal 70-80 percent of the market price, for apartments with a market value in excess of 900 million won. The government is expected to propose a further increase in assessed values, bringing them even closer to market rates.
Similarly, land is under-valued in the government’s tax assessments. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport has said it plans to raise the assessed value of land from its current rate of 65.5 percent of the market price to 70 percent over the next seven years.
While the recent tax hikes were enacted on Dec. 16, before the coronavirus outbreak, there has been a growing chorus of calls that the government should ease up on the increased tax burden to avoid exacerbating the economic damage of the pandemic. Analysts in recent weeks have increasingly sounded the alarm that Korea’s economy is likely to experience negative growth this year.
The number of property owners that now have to pay comprehensive real estate taxes has increased this year, both in Gangnam’s posh neighborhoods and in Gangbuk District in northern Seoul. The government has specifically targeted what it characterizes as speculation in the Gangnam area.
Since the government made new value assessments of apartments available last week, more than 35,000 taxpayers have filed requests that the government readjust its assessment. It’s the largest number of such requests that have ever been made.
Lee Nak-yon, a former prime minister who last week won a seat at the National Assembly as a Democratic Party (DP) lawmaker, has promised to ease the burden of the comprehensive real estate tax on single-apartment owners who live in the apartment. One of his DP colleagues, floor leader Lee In-young, has also made similar pledges.
“Unlike the assessed value, which remains unchanged throughout a year, market price constantly changes,” said Rho Tae-ug, real estate professor at Kangnam University. “That’s why in previous administrations they left a wide gap between the assessed value and the market value as a buffer.”
If the government raises assessed values without considering market fluctuations, there could be cases the assessed value could actually exceed the market value when the real estate market falls into stagnation, Rho added.
The DP’s new majority is also likely to give new life to the government’s proposal to build new towns around the greater Seoul area in a bid to increase housing supply and stabilize prices.
Until now, the opposition party has demanded a full re-evaluation of those plans.
The debate over the new towns has been especially heated regarding Goyang, Gyeonggi, which is Land Minister Kim Hyun-mee’s previous constituency. Kim was previously a DP lawmaker representing Goyang.
That district’s opposition party candidate in the recent elections said she would scrap the new town plans, which many residents believe would only contribute to lowering the neighborhoods’ apartment prices. Her opponent from the DP won the seat last week.
The government has also begun pushing to create a ceiling on the sale prices of preconstruction apartments.
Due to the coronavirus, the government suspended the implementation of the ceiling on apartment projects built on private land until the end of July.
But construction industry lobbying groups, including the Construction Association of Korea, Korea Housing Association and the Korea Housing Builders Association, have requested that the ceiling implementation be suspended another six months.
The government currently has thus far refused their request.
Another proposed set of regulations would require reporting all rent, whether it’s the long-term housing rent known as jeonse or monthly rent, and would impose a maximum limit on rent.
Last year, DP lawmaker Ahn Ho-young and the Land Ministry introduced a bill that would require every rent payment and its price to be reported to the government within a given period, similar to other housing transactions.
Those proposals, however, are expected to fall through.
Separately, some in the housing market have speculated that the government will restart the discussion around the public concept of land ownership.
The idea posits that the government could intervene or limit the ownership and disposal of lands accordingly to the public interest, granting authorities the power to raises taxes on what they deem excessive land profits.
This concept was first raised during the early stages of President Moon Jae-in’s administration and resurfaced in February after Lee, the DP floor leader, said its adoption would be necessary to fundamentally solve the real estate problem.
With the government preparing for a cornucopia of regulations, some analysts worry it could damage the real estate market at a time when the coronavirus pandemic is depressing demand.
“If the government does not change its course on [housing] policies, the reconstruction market could face further hardship, and with the coronavirus, the real estate market could fall into a deeper recession,” Konkuk University real estate Prof. Shim Gyo-eon.
BY HAN EUN-HWA [email@example.com]
More in Economy
June 1 property tax increases are happening as planned
It's a good time to give away residences
Unemployment line adds insult to injury for the jobless
Number of part-time workers hits record high