Abandon the nuclear phase-outLee Deok-hwan
The government is pressing ahead headlong with the pursuit of its carbon-neutrality and hydrogen-economy goals. We cannot neglect the global endeavors to address the climate change crisis. But we need not try so hard to show off in vain actions to set an example. Even when carbon neutrality is a necessary goal, the action plan requires careful consideration of feasibility and cost. If a goal is set too ambitiously, it cannot be achieved.
Attention towards renewables such as solar and wind power is important, but they cannot be a panacea. Few countries in the world can provide 70 percent of energy from solar panels and wind farms. Since solar and wind power rely on terribly fickle and volatile climate, we cannot source energy from them whenever we need it. We may be able to run factories and use electricity at home only when there is enough sunlight and wind. Energy storage solutions cannot alone solve the problem.
China can provide a lesson. The country has invested heavily on solar panels and wind farms. Wind farms account for 12.8 percent of the energy in its windy northeast region. Solar panels provide 11.5 percent of China’s energy supply. Coal-fired thermal power stations remain the primary energy source in China. They account for 49.1 percent of power generators and are responsible for 60.8 percent of electricity.
Wind, solar, and coal generators caused problems in turn last summer. Wind stopped blowing in the northeast region in July. Similar climate setbacks happened a year ago. As a result, wind generation halved. Then, heavy rain throughout the summer destabilized solar generation and inundated coal mines. To make matters worse, coal imports shriveled due to China’s conflict with Australia.
Too great expectations about the hydrogen economy are also dangerous. The ad claiming that the nontoxic gas filling 75 percent of the universe can power a car is entirely misleading. The conditions on Earth are completely different. Hydrogen on the earth is a rare resource.
Production of completely environmental-friendly hydrogen is impossible. To create electricity out of absolutely clean hydrogen, which process requires electricity to make, is ridiculous. It would be more reasonable to use electricity to drive cars with the electricity used for the production of clean hydrogen. Electricity generated from current technology could be a simpler and safer energy source than incomplete future hydrogen technology.
Fortunately, we have a reliable source. Korea’s nuclear reactors — accredited to be the world’s’ best in economy and safety — can be the most reliable means to achieve carbon neutrality. Nuclear is the only existing technology that emits zero greenhouse gases. It can be the sole instrument for the country to meet its goal to reduce emissions by 40 percent by 2030. Korea succeeded in designing the system-integrated modular advanced reactor (SMART) in 2012, the origin of small modular reactors (SMR) pushed by Bill Gates. We must protect the technology from the government’s rush to phase out nuclear reactors.
Britain is eager to install nuclear reactors. We must learn the lesson from the country returning to the nuclear power, which it commercialized first in the world and shunned later to shift to renewables. France which mulled an exit from nuclear energy is also seriously deliberating increasing reactor capacity. Japan which had suspended nuclear reactors after the Fukushima meltdown is also reactivating reactors. Developing technology to enhance safety of reactors and strengthening maintenance system would be the most practical option.
Translation by the Korea JoongAng Daily staff.