Samsung wants verdict thrown outSamsung Electronics urged a U.S. appeals court to toss a $930 million verdict won by Apple, saying the Korean company didn’t copy the iPhone’s design and unique look and arguing that the damage award was too high.
“They awarded Samsung’s total profit for all of these phones - this is absurd,” Kathleen Sullivan, representing Samsung, told the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington on Friday. “It’s like awarding the profit of an entire car because of infringement of the design of the cup holder.”
Apple and Samsung have dropped most of their legal battles - this and a second trial that’s also before the appeals court are all that remain of a fight across four continents. This verdict is the largest awarded in any of the so-called smartphone wars, and an appeals court decision determining the proper damages could help foster an eventual settlement.
Apple has said it revolutionized a stagnant smartphone market when it introduced the iPhone in 2007, only to see a rash of copycats. Within months of the iPhone’s introduction, Samsung was taking the phone apart to see what made it special, Apple lawyer William Lee of WilmerHale told the three-judge panel.
“After two years, their market share was plummeting,” Lee said. “In three months, they came up with something that was identical” to the iPhone.
Much of the jury verdict - and Samsung’s appeal - focused on the look of Samsung’s older models and the value of Apple’s designs. Of the total award, $399 million was based on findings that Samsung had copied three patented designs for the shape, corners, translucent screen and colorful icon; another $382 million was for the trademarked look.
Even if the patents were infringed, Sullivan said, the damage award was too high.
The court isn’t expected to rule for several months.