Where the NYT editorial board goes over the line

Home > Opinion > Letters

print dictionary print

Where the NYT editorial board goes over the line

*The Jan. 13 New York Times “Politicians and Textbooks,” editorial compares Mr. Abe’s effort to endorse textbooks whitewashing the Korean sex slaves issue with President Park Geun-hye’s introduction of textbooks that reflect differing views on Korea’s history of colonialism and postcolonial dictatorships. The former can never receive justification, for it “denies” historical facts substantiated by ample evidence. The latter, however, resembles the former in no way that it “reviews” historical facts from different perspectives. Equating pure denial with review is a flawed comparison. The editorial shows no sign of journalism ethics, citing no source when it associates “a majority of professionals and elite civil servants” in Korea with Japanese colonizers. In journalism, facts backed by data command authority; this line fails to do so.

by Choi Si-young, Editing advsor of Yonsei European Studies at Yonsei University

More in Letters

A farewell to Kim Young-hie

Chasing the trends to survive

Avoiding the elephant in the room

Letters to the editor

Refute from Iranian Embassy

Log in to Twitter or Facebook account to connect
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
help-image Social comment?
lock icon

To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.

Standards Board Policy (0/250자)

What’s Popular Now