A taste of Korea in London
Korean food is becoming popular in the United Kingdom. I get automatic updates on any English-language articles regarding Korean food around the world. In 2008, the number of American articles on Korean food started rising. The same started happening in the United Kingdom six months ago. Taste of London celebrates the city’s food industry by inviting people to taste foods from various restaurants and companies in the United Kingdom. I attended the festival last month to help promote Korean food at the event’s first Korean food pavilion.
You may think that the pavilion was sponsored by the Korean government. It was not. A private Korean food importer paid for it. There was a much larger Thai food scene supported by its government, but the Korean government was not involved with the festival. Why were they absent? It was the perfect chance to promote Korean food to the public and it succeeded.
Londoners were ecstatic over spicy ramyeon, bulgogi, dalkgalbi and the treats coming from London’s blooming Korean street food scene. After enjoying a dram of single malt Scotch, curious festivalgoers went to the Korean tent to try a glass of somaek (a mix of soju and beer). Diners at Erskin’s pop-up restaurant left as Hansik (Korean food) addicts. Behind the scenes, chefs, restaurateurs and food industry specialists learned more about Korean ingredients and asked questions about how to use them in their businesses.
Getting people to try Korean food is part of a three-pronged approach to successfully promoting Korean cuisine. First, get people to experience the taste. Then, get chefs to cook it. Finally, show people how easy it is to make at home. The first two steps make Korean food a trend and the final step means the food will stay around longer than other fad cuisines.
I have been closely observing the government’s efforts in the three-part method since it started in 2008. Almost every project was a waste of time and money. Even worse, the government actively competed with and even sabotaged the industry it was trying to promote. There were plans a few years ago to open a government-run restaurant in Manhattan, directly competing against other Korean restaurants there. Rather than supporting existing blogs that were successfully promoting Korean food, the government created its own blog, which failed miserably. At one point, the government said it would support the chef-owner of a Michelin-starred Korean restaurant in cooking a banquet for the James Beard Awards, which are the top food awards in America. At the last minute, the government pulled its funding, forcing the chef to pay for the banquet with his own money.
What’s even more galling is to hear the government take credit for the success of Korean food. They did not help Korean restaurants earn Michelin stars. The chefs and staff of those restaurants did it through hard work. The street food vendors, cookbook writers, bloggers and others did it with no financial support from the government. It was not accomplished by paying K-pop bands huge amounts of money to make embarrassing videos. It was not done through useless studies comparing the sperm counts of men who eat bibimbap versus those who eat foreign junk food. Spending 5 billion won ($4.8 million) to change “ddeokbokki” (spicy rice cakes) to “topokki” didn’t do anything.
Rather than compete with the people who are promoting Korean food, the government should have the humility and wisdom to work with them.
The heart of it is that the government is too locally centered to successfully execute an international campaign. They rarely pay attention to the markets they’re marketing to. They are aware of name brands like The New York Times and CNN, but they hardly know who the big players are in the international food scene. In one incident, powerhouse food publication Gourmet planned to do a TV show on food in Korea, and they reached out to the Korean government for help. But they were roundly ignored because the officials had never heard of them. They only care about what they think are name brands, such as K-pop groups that aren’t as popular internationally as they’d like to think. I’ve heard that their lack of involvement in Taste of London was due to budget constraints. It’s too bad that all those funds were spent on other ineffective projects.
*The author is the founder and president of the Korean food site ZenKimchi International.
BY Joe McPherson
More in Columns
Revolt and its ramifications
A kiddie talent pool
A well-calculated move
Waking up from an illusion