Public safety at a priceRecently, music by Korean film composer Cho Young-wuk was performed at the Odeon West End. Eight members of the Philharmonic Orchestra played his scores in a very acoustically satisfying concert. But something was missing visually: the stage was too big for eight performers, and the electronic keyboard being used seemed too small on the stage. A grand piano would have looked better.
The staff of the Korean Cultural Center U.K., which had organized the event, explained that it was a safety measure. The theater said it was built for cinema screenings and that the stage may not be sturdy enough for too many people and props. No more than eight people can stand on it at the same time, which was why an eight-member ensemble was formed. A grand piano, which weighs more than several people combined, was definitely not an option. I thought the theater was being overly cautious.
In 2011, when K-pop boy band SHINee held a concert in the theater, the venue’s manager repeatedly asked the stars never to wave at fans or urge them to approach the stage. Unlike a concert hall, the theater didn’t have many exits, and it could have been dangerous if excited fans had flocked to the stage.
A series of accidents based on negligence in Korea reminded me of the United Kingdom’s overly cautious attitude. Some people in Korea may be pledging to prepare safety measures on par with developed countries, but I wonder if the plan takes the behavior of people into account as well as regulations.
Living in a developed country, safety feels rather inconvenient at times. The underground system in London was built in the late 1800s, so screen doors cannot be installed in many stations. When there are too many passengers waiting on the platform as a train approaches, station staff blow whistles loudly and a “Mind the gap” warning is repeatedly broadcast. When there are too many passengers in the station, the underground’s entrance is closed. If there is construction, the tube passes a station, and on weekends, some lines are closed. On rainy days, the trains run so slowly you may think it would be faster to walk. The underground passages are designed as one-way paths to prevent pedestrians from bumping into each other, and you can easily get lost.
Having a complicated and prudent system means employing enough staff, and the burden is shared by everyone who buys train tickets and pays taxes. The merit of the inconvenient yet safe system is that there are no accidents. In the end, safety is only guaranteed when we endure inconvenience and cost, and refuse expedited measures for immediate benefits. How does this compare to Korea?
*The author is a London correspondent of the JoongAng Ilbo. JoongAng Ilbo, Oct. 21, Page 34
By KO JUNG-AE