A sad portrait of Korean press

Home > Opinion > Columns

print dictionary print

A sad portrait of Korean press

테스트

In Japan, certain reporters are in charge of covering the prime minister. The sori-ban reporters stay in front of the elevator to the official residence and check the schedule of the prime minister around the clock. They follow what time the prime minister comes in and leaves work, what time he meets whom and where and with whom he has lunch and dinner with. Political news reporters have to take this duty for a year or two. The sori-ban reporters race to the bathroom to make sure they don’t miss any visitors. They have to finish meals as quickly as possible. Thanks to their close watch, readers can be informed of what the prime minister was up to in the morning newspaper.

But it is different in Korea. Blue House correspondents cannot get out of the Chunchugwan, the press center of the Blue House, except for special occasions. They cannot see the president or check whom she meets. As the Choi Soon-sil scandal was revealed, not just the reporters but even the Blue House chief of staff and secretaries could hardly see the president. And shadowy string-pullers like Choi Soon-sil frequented the Blue House as a so-called confidential visitor and meddled with state administration.

While the Blue House correspondents were strictly restricted from watching, the Blue House under Park Geun-hye has been obsessing over watching the media. According to the notes of a late secretary, the Blue House attempted judicial sanctions on reports that did not suit its tastes, exercised administrative sanctions through the Korea Communications Commission, Korea Communications Standards Commission or the Press Arbitration Commission, and used civil groups to exert social pressure. While the notes were kept while the secretary was serving in the Blue House, the basic direction was maintained, or even enhanced, after the secretary and director changed. The Blue House chief of staff or secretaries commanded what staff at the ministry of culture and information during the Park Chung Hee regime did for his daughter. The clock of the Blue House is turning backward.

The government’s media watch is directly reflected in the evaluation of the international community on Korea’s freedom of press. International organization Reporters Without Borders ranked Korea’s freedom of press index 70th among 180 nations surveyed. Korea’s ranking went up to 31st place in 2006 during the Roh Moo-hyun administration, but plummeted to 69th in 2009 in the Lee Myung-bak administration. And the level of freedom of information fell once again to 70th place.

The Reporters Without Borders indicated that the relationship between the government and media is very tense under the Park Geun-hye administration, which does not endure criticism and threatens press independence. The organization also pointed out that open discussion of relations with North Korea is prohibited by the National Security Act and favorable reports and broadcasting toward North Korea are subject to punishment. Moreover, libel charges can lead to up to seven years in prison, so the media have to censor themselves.

According to freedom of press report by international human rights organization Freedom House, which is relatively more conservative than the Reporters Without Borders, Korea’s press freedom received 33 points, 66th place among 199 nations surveyed. Korea got 31 points in 2013, 32 in 2014 and 33 in 2015. Higher points mean more freedom. In the last few years, the press freedom points gradually went up but stopped last year, meaning the freedom of information has withered and did not improve. Freedom House categorized Korea as “partly free” in the category of Freedom of Press. While Koreans may think democracy has been attained, freedom of press is still partial, unlike the developed economy, to the eyes of international organizations.

What is the difference in outcomes between a nation where media faithfully watch the power and a nation where power aggressively watches the media? The difference in status between Japanese Prime Minister Abe and Korean President Park is significant. Abe, whose whereabouts are thoroughly under watch, maintains a 50 percent approval rating. Having been out of the media’s watch and had the Blue House actively watch the media, Park Geun-hye has hit the historical low of a 4 percent approval rating and awaits the ruling of the Constitutional Court on her impeachment.

As Korea goes through Choi-gate, many people agree that the nation should use the opportunity to move on to a new social paradigm. What’s most important is to guarantee the media’s role to watch power and limit power’s watch over the media. Joseon period scholar Yi I said, “When the channel of speech is open, the nation is ruled properly. When the channel is blocked, the nation becomes chaotic.” Through the Park-Choi scandal, Koreans painfully confirm Yi I’s proposition.

Translation by the Korea JoongAng Daily staff.

JoongAng Ilbo, Dec. 29, Page 35


*The author is a professor emeritus at the School of Media and Communications of Korea University.

Kim Min-hwan
Log in to Twitter or Facebook account to connect
with the Korea JoongAng Daily
help-image Social comment?
s
lock icon

To write comments, please log in to one of the accounts.

Standards Board Policy (0/250자)

What’s Popular Now